Search for: "In the Matter of Amendments to Rules 1 and 10"
Results 3601 - 3620
of 5,513
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Mar 2017, 4:57 pm
” Verizon also allegedly manipulated financial information in the Form 10 and advertising materials to make Idearc appear like a growing, profitable business. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 8:42 am
If the Government, or 10% of the deputies, or 1/5 of the Committees request it, or if the mandatory opinion is not requested, the bill is re-submitted to the Plenary. [read post]
18 May 2021, 6:30 am
A review of the changes found on page 48 (Figure 10-1: Blank Consent to Release Note) indicates this does not apply to the attestation portion toward the top third for the “Beneficiary Initials. [read post]
17 Jan 2020, 12:56 pm
Oracle Am., slip op. at 10. [read post]
Shining the Spotlight on Trademark Bullies (a Long-Delayed Recap of a Trademark Scholars Roundtable)
13 Oct 2010, 10:16 am
First, if the private adjudicators adopt private rules that are more regressive than trademark law, the statute's doctrinal boundaries matter less. [read post]
22 Jun 2022, 6:40 am
” You may ask why any of this matters. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 10:59 am
Alabama, which held that life without parole for minors violates the Eighth Amendment. [read post]
12 Oct 2022, 9:04 am
Laredo (5th Cir. 2022), where he wrote in support of the First Amendment rights of journalists to ask questions of the police (even about confidential matters). [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 12:37 pm
Unless otherwise stated, they’re effective starting January 1, 2022. [read post]
23 Dec 2024, 11:18 am
” Sections 75-1-201(2)(a), 90-4-1001(1)(c)-(g), MCNA (2011). [read post]
23 Jun 2019, 4:25 pm
The ASA website published the ruling. [read post]
29 Mar 2007, 5:36 am
"The Report deals in particular with the right to silence, allowing character evidence of an accused, the exclusionary rule of evidence, requiring an accused to outline the nature of his defence before or at the commencement of trial, re-opening new evidence, nullifying an acquittal where there is evidence of jury or witness tampering, "with prejudice" appeals in the case of wrongful acquittal, extending alibi evidence rules to other analogous situations, allowing… [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 7:03 pm
Lauderdale 2013 Standard Mileage Rates Announced IRS Shares Rules Allowing Government Plans To Switch Remedial Amendment Cycles Reminder To Amend Health FSA Plan Terms To Include ACA $2500 Contribution Before 2013 Plan Year Begins Bank’ $1Million Plus Overtime Settlement Shows Risks of Misapplying FLSA’s Administrative Exemption Labor Department Serves The Christmas Light Co. [read post]
31 Oct 2021, 6:33 pm
Art.1, § 22 (amendment 10) and the rights it affords. [read post]
December 14, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
13 Dec 2009, 8:58 pm
The U.N. wants rich nations to put up $10 billion annually between 2010 and 2012 for climate change mitigation. [read post]
23 May 2023, 5:16 am
The Bright-Line Rule The guidelines have an unusual origin story. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 8:48 pm
These particular types of IIAs, which often form part of a complete trade cooperation package, operationalize the international right of development through: 1) permissible differentiation or graduated implementation of host State obligations, taking the host State’s stage of economic development into account; 2) transparency obligations and information exchanges between treaty partners; 3) joint investment promotion activities by treaty partners; and 4) coordinated institutional… [read post]
27 Dec 2024, 5:00 am
South Korea’s Constitution (Constitution No. 10, Oct. 29, 1987) and the Martial Law Act (Act No. 3442, Apr. 17, 1981, as amended) do not define martial law. [read post]
25 Feb 2022, 12:12 pm
Duties include: (1) Developing strategies and recommendations related to human health and the environment in Indian Country; (2) Working with American Indian Environmental Office (AIEO) Senior Advisors in [read post]
19 Sep 2018, 8:39 am
In determining whether speech is commercial speech that could be limited, the California Supreme Court had ruled that trial courts should consider three elements: (1) the identity of the speaker; (2) the intended audience; and (3) the content of the message. [read post]
