Search for: "Law v. United States"
Results 3601 - 3620
of 62,880
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jun 2016, 12:22 pm
Florida (Indian Gaming Regulatory Act - Good Faith Negotiations)State Courts Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2016state.html White v. [read post]
17 Apr 2008, 2:22 pm
Most Popular Federal Law Article Sprint/United Management Co. v. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 2:31 am
Most people, understandably, see the Supreme Court of the United States as the court of last resort. [read post]
Last Week at the 6th Circuit: Substantive unreasonableness, maiden voyages, and railroaded state law
21 May 2019, 11:03 am
in United States v. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 3:38 pm
” states Justice Gorsuch in his concurring opinion in Sessions v. [read post]
21 Nov 2014, 2:55 pm
Peabody Western Coal Company (tribal employment preferences) * United States Federal Trial Courts Bulletin http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/dct/2014dct.htmlHeldt v. [read post]
15 Jan 2025, 3:30 am
Sheila Vélez Martínez This article, written by four distinguished Latina legal scholars, provides an analysis of the unique challenges, achievements, and potential future for Latina law professors and educators in the United States. [read post]
16 Aug 2020, 12:22 pm
The United States Supreme Court, in an opinion authored by Justice Neil Gorsuch, announced that the Muscogee (Creek) Nation’s reservation boundaries had never been disestablished. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 6:30 am
The myth of the isolationist United States is the myth that will not die. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 1:05 pm
Petitioner reiterated that he never waived his Miranda Rights and never gave a statement to any law enforcement officers, including the lead detective. [read post]
23 Mar 2022, 2:04 pm
Ute Indian Tribes of the Uintah and Ouray Reservation (Tribal Law; Tribal Courts; Banishment) Stephen C. v. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 9:02 am
Instead, it is a unanimous opinion stating: "Instant Runoff Voting as adopted in Minneapolis is not facially invalid under the United States or Minnesota Constitution, and does not contravene any principles established by this court in Brown v. [read post]
4 Jul 2009, 2:48 pm
On June 29, 2009, the United States Supreme Court decided Cuomo v. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 6:56 am
United States, and at issue is the question of whether the federal sentencing guidelines are binding or only advisory when defendants who were originally sentenced before the decision in United States v. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 12:31 pm
The United States Supreme Court is engaged in behavior never before seen in American history argues Mark Lemley, the William H. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 5:30 am
As a result, Chapter 9 violates the Supremacy Clause in Article VI of the United State Constitution. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 8:52 am
(Eugene Volokh) The case is today’s Fletcher v. [read post]
20 Apr 2014, 5:28 am
" It also argued that because the cba used the terms spouse as well as significant other, those terms should be interpreted to be interchangeable.Arbitrator Sarah R Cole has issued an award, relying on the Supreme Court's decision in United States v. [read post]
4 Jun 2003, 9:42 am
United States, the US Supreme Court decided that wiretapping private telephone conversations to secure evidence was permissible. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 9:44 am
On February 4, 2015 the Supreme Court of Ohio will hear oral argument in the case of State of Ohio v. [read post]
