Search for: "Lord v. State"
Results 3601 - 3620
of 4,048
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Feb 2010, 7:20 am
In a written judgment, the Lord Ordinary found the applicant's claims to be unfounded and unspecified.# The applicant appealed to the Inner House. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 12:15 pm
R(on the application of Binyam Mohamed) v Secretary of State for Foreign & Commonwealth Affairs [2010] EWCA Civ 65 This appeal was brought by the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs (“the Foreign Secretary”) against a decision of the Divisional Court to include seven short paragraphs in the open version of a judgment, notwithstanding the fact that the Foreign Secretary had started in a number of Public Interest Immunity Certificates… [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 7:10 am
As an example of the usefulness of these, take the case of Abbott v. [read post]
21 Feb 2010, 2:30 pm
In Meletios Apostolides v. [read post]
20 Feb 2010, 5:05 am
It is of course “a disgrace to the law”, as was said in the Court of King’s Bench by Lord Tenterden CJ in The King v Somerton (1827) 7 B&C 463 at pp 466-467, “that criminals should be allowed to escape by nice and captious objections of form”. [read post]
20 Feb 2010, 2:31 am
In this connection, a recent judgment of the Court of Appeal in Secretary of State v. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 4:07 pm
Lord Hope's main judgment, with which Lady Hale and Lord Brown agreed, traced the history of cases before and after Runa Begum. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 4:07 pm
Lord Hope's main judgment, with which Lady Hale and Lord Brown agreed, traced the history of cases before and after Runa Begum. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 2:43 pm
This case concerns an appeal [2010] EWCA Civ. 33 from the August 2008 judgment in Eli Lilly & Co. v Human Genome Sciences Inc., [2008] EWHC 1903 (Pat), wherein Mr. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 2:43 pm
This case concerns an appeal [2010] EWCA Civ. 33 from the August 2008 judgment in Eli Lilly & Co. v Human Genome Sciences Inc., [2008] EWHC 1903 (Pat), wherein Mr. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 2:27 pm
The latest chapter of the “Brand Owners v Counterfeiters” saga seems again to be playing out in favour of brand owners, with last week’s decision of a Paris District Court holding eBay responsible for facilitating the sale of counterfeit Louis Vuitton products. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 5:43 am
See Reynolds v. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 11:52 pm
In the case of Johnston v NEI International Combustion [2007] UKHL 39, the House of Lords held that such pleural plaque claims were not compensatable under the current laws. [read post]
14 Feb 2010, 2:36 pm
The objectives of the Heidelberg Report When the Report was prepared, its authors were fully aware of the pending reference of the House of Lords to the ECJ in West Tankers and expected the outcome of the case. [read post]
14 Feb 2010, 8:58 am
We will certainly be glad for the compo”.Lord David Ramsbotham, at the Barred from Voting campaign meeting in Parliament last Monday, stated that he intends to raise the serious issue of Lord Bach making a misleading statement in Parliament. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 7:12 am
As Barbara reminded the Commission in her net neutrality filing, “Section 230(b)(2) flatly declares that it is the policy of the United States ? [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 3:16 am
“The following seven paragraphs have been redacted [It was reported that a new series of interviews was conducted by the United States authorities prior to 17 May 2001 as part of a new strategy designed by an expert interviewer. v) It was reported that at some stage during that further interview process by the United States authorities, BM had been intentionally subjected to continuous sleep deprivation. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 12:42 am
” Giving judgment in Welwyn Hatfield Council v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government and Beesley [2010] EWCA Civ 26, Mummery LJ said Beesley told the council he proposed to build a new hay barn on the land, that no change of use was required and provision for sewage disposal was not needed. [read post]
6 Feb 2010, 3:26 pm
(See, e.g., the 2 Live Crew case, Campbell v. [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 6:19 am
” This is a truly astonishing state of affairs. [read post]
