Search for: "M. B.1." Results 3601 - 3620 of 13,695
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Nov 2011, 8:47 am by Mi Patente
Por: Miguel Ángel Rodríguez   Algunos empresarios arriesgados de nuestro México están haciendo esfuerzos por realizar el desarrollo conceptual de nuestro rescate cultural a través de productos como cigarros, ropa, alimentos y servicios. [read post]
5 May 2014, 4:50 pm
Nevertheless, I’m disappointed in his recent article in The New Republic on J Street, Israel, and American Jews. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 5:32 pm
New subsection (b)(6): This section is lengthy, so I'm not going do retype it here. [read post]
17 Feb 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
In its decision G 1/03 [2.5.3] the EBA states: “The same must apply if sufficiency of disclosure is at stake. [read post]
30 Oct 2006, 6:48 am
I’m reminded of this by two things which at first may seem unrelated: an incident involving an attempt to incite the arrest of Michael Schiavo and an amendment to the (former) Insurrections Act, which has now morphed into an act regarding “Enforcement of the Laws to Restore Public Order,” an amendment which has sparked a remarkable amount of blog angst about possible martial law. [read post]
14 Aug 2018, 12:32 pm by Jonathan Holbrook
I would go further and recommend that the statutory reference at the end of Count #1 include both G.S. 14-72(a) and 72(b)(6), to avoid any possible argument that the defendant was not put on notice that the substantive charge in Count #1 is alleged to be a felony. [read post]
2 Jan 2019, 10:45 pm by Rechtsanwalt Martin Steiger
Weiter verbietet das UWG unter anderem irreführende Angaben (Art. 3 Abs. 1 lit. b UWG) und besonders aggressive Verkaufsmethoden, die Kunden in ihrer Entscheidungsfreiheit beeinträchtigen (Art. 3 Abs. 1 lit. h UWG). [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 1:44 pm by Edward Smith
South Lake Tahoe Summer Traffic South Lake Tahoe Summer Traffic I’m Ed Smith, a South Lake Tahoe auto accident attorney. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 3:44 pm by NL
As per Lady Hale (as she was) in R (M) v Slough London Borough Council [2008] 1 WLR 1808, at para 36: “Although M is HIV positive, his medical needs are being catered for by the National Health Service so, even if they did amount to a need for care and attention within the meaning of section 21(1)(a), he would not qualify, but, for the reasons given above, I do not think that they amount to such a need … as he does not fall within section… [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 3:44 pm by NL
As per Lady Hale (as she was) in R (M) v Slough London Borough Council [2008] 1 WLR 1808, at para 36: “Although M is HIV positive, his medical needs are being catered for by the National Health Service so, even if they did amount to a need for care and attention within the meaning of section 21(1)(a), he would not qualify, but, for the reasons given above, I do not think that they amount to such a need … as he does not fall within section 21(1)(a) it… [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 5:57 am by Eugene Volokh
” I’m delighted to report that leading Internet lawyer Venkat Balasubramani (Focal Law LLC) and I have filed a lawsuit challenging this statute. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 5:58 am by Evidence ProfBlogger
That said, I'm not at all certain of my position, which is why I'm posing the question here. [read post]