Search for: "Marks v. State"
Results 3601 - 3620
of 19,798
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jan 2012, 7:00 am
” Interestingly enough, one of the leading cases in Canada dealing with the doctrine of functionality was the decision of the Supreme Court of Canada in Kirkbi AG v. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 7:45 am
Judge Mark L. [read post]
4 Aug 2009, 2:42 pm
See Rivera v. [read post]
10 Oct 2012, 12:46 pm
" Harbison v. [read post]
16 May 2007, 6:18 am
United States v. [read post]
14 Sep 2019, 5:59 pm
Chanel, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 2:33 pm
" Doe also stated that he and Student B hadn't studied together, whereas Student B said otherwise.Then there are the answers to particular questions. [read post]
15 Mar 2018, 11:22 am
In three separate motions filed in Clark v. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 2:58 am
In Rogers v. [read post]
18 Aug 2020, 5:09 am
Which way next for Nokia v Daimler? [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 4:30 am
The Press explains:On March 8, 1971, the Supreme Court of the United States decided a case, Griggs v. [read post]
19 Sep 2020, 3:47 am
Ginsburg also made her mark on intellectual property law, from patent law decisions such as Microsoft Corp v AT&T, to copyright in Eldred v Ashcroft. [read post]
16 Feb 2023, 6:35 am
Jones v. [read post]
14 Nov 2010, 12:20 pm
United States v. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 8:08 am
The current (April 2010) issue of Sweet & Maxwell's European Trade Mark Reports (click here for details) carries reports on various important recent trade mark cases, the first of which is an English translation of the ruling of the Court of Appeal of 's Hertengebosch in Revillon Chocolatier v Trianon Chocolatiers BV. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 6:02 am
Jones v. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 4:30 am
After all, the use of quotation marks suggests that the objection itself must be verbatim and not a paraphrase, and the rule provides that “objections are waived if not stated as phrased. [read post]
31 May 2011, 9:10 am
S. patent markings, copied all but the fryer's cosmetic features, and retained an attorney to conduct a right-to-use study without telling him it had copied directly from SEB's design. [read post]
5 Dec 2024, 3:24 am
" Towers v. [read post]
22 May 2017, 9:32 am
” Thomas & Betts Corp. v. [read post]