Search for: "Marks v. United States" Results 3601 - 3620 of 9,189
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jul 2016, 3:03 pm by Mark Graber
University of Texas at Austin, permanently enjoined the enforcement of Obama administration immigration policies in United States v. [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 8:24 pm
(Pix © Larry Catá Backer 2015)The history of the United States has been, if nothing else, a history of tremendous battles over the definition and control of the societal structures that define and discipline its politics, law, and culture--its sense of self as a polity and community. [read post]
25 Oct 2021, 9:39 am by Mary Ziegler
The United States, which until now had never brought a challenge to a state abortion restriction, argued that S.B. 8 interferes with its sovereign interest in ensuring that states recognize federal constitutional rights. [read post]
18 Mar 2018, 2:50 pm by JB
  The public policy in this case is the public's right to know about the private life of the President of the United States before he became President. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 4:33 pm by Jeremy Malcolm
It might be assumed that an extension of the copyright term in the TPP wouldn't affect the United States, because our law already provides for that same copyright term. [read post]
12 Dec 2010, 3:02 pm by Morris Turek
  This is not surprising since there are approximately 180,000 mailboxes of this type located across the United States. [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 4:27 pm by Bill Heinze
(quotation and alteration marks omitted). [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 1:39 am
DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Criminal Practice Cocaine, Crack Distribution Conspirator's Sentence Reduced to 240-Month Mandatory Minimum Term United States v. [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 1:43 pm
  "The overriding consideration in this case," the judge ruled, "is that some of the very same issues Plaintiff presents here are currently pending for decision before the Supreme Court of the United States," citing the case of Baze v. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 2:00 pm by Bexis
Bazarsky, The Future of PennsylvaniaProducts Liability as Applied by Federal and State Courts: Covell v. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 2:37 am by gmlevine
“I make no comment whatsoever” (the Panel states) “on whether or not Respondent’s use of the Domain Name and Complainant’s WALMART marks on its website might otherwise be in violation of relevant United States state or federal trademark laws. [read post]