Search for: "Matter of John D." Results 3601 - 3620 of 6,866
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
For their work on these matters, I’d like to thank members of the SEC staff including: Haoxiang Zhu, Andrea Orr, David Saltiel, William Miller, Kyle Druding, Sharon Park, Roni Bergoffen, Eric Juzenas, Michael Coe, Michael Gaw, David Liu, Leah Mesfin, Michou Nguyen, Geoffrey Pemble, Justin Pica, Leah Drennan Will Magliocco, Carol McGee, John Guidroz, Israel Goodman, Matthew Lee, and Stephanie Park in the Division of Trading and Markets; Meridith Mitchell, Robert… [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 3:28 pm
They checked their list-serve for Professor John Bonine's administrative law class. [read post]
4 May 2022, 5:01 am by Albert W. Alschuler
In 1934, the Senate found that he’d enabled a client to destroy documents it had subpoenaed and held him in contempt. [read post]
27 May 2011, 11:16 am by Deborah Pearlstein
AQAP was added to the list in 2009.)These are useful examples, but I’d say still don’t really make the case for new and improved use-of-force authorization. [read post]
27 May 2011, 10:20 am by Deborah Pearlstein
These are useful examples, but I’d say still don’t really make the case for new and improved use-of-force authorization. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 8:37 am by David Lat
In addition to the clerkship bonus, BuckleySandler’s total compensation package is competitive with what you’d get at a Biglaw firm. [read post]
14 Nov 2021, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
Virginia (1967), “Over the years, this Court has consistently repudiated ‘[d]istinctions between citizens solely because of their ancestry’ as being ‘odious to a free people whose institutions are founded upon the doctrine of equality. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 4:28 pm by Lyle Denniston
  Appearing for the U.S. government, as amicus supporting the bank and others, will be Matthew D. [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 5:00 am by Charlotte Butash, Hilary Hurd
… [C]ompelling one of the President’s immediate advisers to testify on a matter of executive decision-making would also raise serious con­stitutional problems, no matter what the assertion of congressional need. [read post]