Search for: "Matter of Robert T" Results 3601 - 3620 of 10,565
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 May 2018, 4:00 am by Jesse Sowell
It is only a matter of time before they take on another abusive client, and the cycle starts again. [read post]
4 May 2018, 2:06 pm by Andrew Hamm
In accordance with this norm, only six percent of the dissents in the first five terms of the Roberts court included the blunter ending. [read post]
4 May 2018, 8:30 am by Keith E. Whittington
But the justices should be reluctant to empower a judge to command the president’s presence no matter the president’s own judgment that he or she is immediately needed elsewhere. [read post]
4 May 2018, 4:22 am by Edith Roberts
” For The Washington Post, Robert Barnes recaps the “blockbuster cases” awaiting decisions this term, remarking that although “[i]t’s not surprising that such cases are taking time,” “the court has also been slow in deciding less controversial matters. [read post]
3 May 2018, 1:50 pm by David Kris
It cited Justice Robert Jackson and other attorneys general taking the same position and making similar assertions. [read post]
3 May 2018, 3:32 am by Scott Bomboy
The current debate is over reports that Special Counsel Robert Mueller brought up the subpoena topic with President Donald Trump’s legal team in March as part of Mueller’s desire to talk to Trump about potential Russian interference in American elections and matters related to Mueller’s investigation. [read post]
2 May 2018, 2:15 pm by Steve Vladeck, Benjamin Wittes
Among other things, executive privilege doesn’t apply to conduct predating the president’s time in office, and it also could not be used to decline to answer questions about matters on the public record. [read post]
2 May 2018, 9:47 am by Native American Rights Fund
Legislation Bulletin http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/legislation/115_uslegislation.html The following bills were added:S.772: Ashlynne Mike AMBER Alert in Indian Country Act S.2706: A bill to amend the Robert T. [read post]
2 May 2018, 8:57 am by Eugene Volokh
Robert Welch, Inc. rule (under which plaintiffs in such cases can't recover presumed or punitive damages absent a showing of "actual malice"). [read post]
2 May 2018, 7:57 am by Benjamin Wittes
The Washington Post reported Monday evening that Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s office has threatened to subpoena the president’s testimony in the Russia probe: In a tense meeting in early March with special counsel Robert S. [read post]
2 May 2018, 3:23 am by SHG
Whether he doesn’t know, or doesn’t care doesn’t matter. [read post]
1 May 2018, 4:33 pm by INFORRM
It never conducts an investigation, no matter how obvious it is to the rest of us that there are sustained problems of unethical practice at some papers. [read post]
1 May 2018, 4:37 am by Christopher J. Walker
” This flummoxed Chief Justice John Roberts. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 9:24 am by Eric Goldman
” This has some parallels to the social media “material support for terrorists” cases where the plaintiffs have argued that Section 230 doesn’t apply to provisioning accounts to terrorists, even though the account only matters when it’s used. [read post]
28 Apr 2018, 12:23 pm by Quinta Jurecic
In contrast, the Special Counsel Transparency Act introduced in the House doesn’t incorporate the special counsel regulations and doesn’t incorporate any judicial review, but it does focus on the reports to be submitted in more detail. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 12:32 pm by Quinta Jurecic
Ah, says Srinivasan, so enemy combatant status doesn’t matter? [read post]