Search for: "PRECISION STANDARD V US"
Results 3601 - 3620
of 4,555
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Nov 2014, 9:27 am
At any rate, the burden is on the plaintiffs, under the Amnesty v. [read post]
8 Feb 2019, 10:29 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 7:05 am
re v. [read post]
30 Apr 2016, 12:10 pm
Intermediate v. strict scrutiny standard: but that’s one of the principal disputes right now. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 5:38 am
In R. v. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 3:31 am
So the California Supreme Court’s 2004 decision (Gates v. [read post]
4 Feb 2016, 4:00 am
Fourth, that this does not require the creation of new categories of workers, or new labels – in fact we can use any term we wish as long as we use it sensibly, i.e. purposively. [read post]
15 Feb 2007, 12:25 am
This regulation states, in pertinent part:(e) Standard: Disclosures for judicial. . .proceedings.(1) Permitted disclosures. [read post]
16 Aug 2014, 12:01 am
See [Wurtz v. [read post]
22 Nov 2022, 11:44 am
The Supreme Court’s unanimous April 2021 decision in AMG Capital Management v. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 4:59 pm
Dole, and legal commentators have struggled to articulate a workable legal standard for what might constitute unconstitutional compulsion. [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 6:31 am
It was also discussed in the judgments C-507/17, Google v CNIL; and Case C-136/17 that a data subject should have a “right to be forgotten” where the retention of such data infringes the Directive 95/46 and the GDPR. [read post]
5 May 2014, 6:16 am
He analyzes the data and information provided by de Beer and Bouchard and suggests that the Board’s unlocatable regime is “a radical shift from the mechanism contemplated by Parliament (or, perhaps more precisely, such a subversion of that mechanism)” (at p. 1329). [read post]
23 Apr 2021, 7:55 am
In Adalah v. [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 7:07 pm
He then proceeds to introduce the case that brings us all to the Miami federal courthouse—or, rather, that brought us here 27 hours ago: The United States of America v. [read post]
19 May 2011, 8:37 am
" The standard under Franks v. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 10:48 am
(California Oak Foundation v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 8:51 am
Only those who itemize their tax deductions (as opposed to taking the standard deduction) can even use the SALT deduction at all, and only about 30% of households (mostly affluent ones) did so in 2013. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 3:00 am
Mountain Lion Foundation v. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 5:20 am
The precise identity of the client, may differ from what lawyers outside the UK might consider to be the client, as we explain below. [read post]
