Search for: "People v. Cross" Results 3601 - 3620 of 5,569
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jun 2012, 9:27 am by Lovechilde
Senator is calling on conservatives to simply ignore the mandates of Roe v. [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 1:46 am
That sometimes people with mild injuries can have worse results than someone with a severe injury? [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 8:45 am by Keith Lee
It dealt with search and seizure of electronic devices at border crossings. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 3:06 pm by luiza
(Tag: International Whistleblowers) Additionally, UK whistleblower protections received a boost in a November 27, 2019, Supreme Court decision (Royal Mail Group Ltd v Jhuti). [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 9:10 pm
  It's really, really hard to cross-examine a transcript, which is why those robed people in D.C. bothered to decide Crawford v. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 4:35 am
Supreme Court's decision in Michigan v. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 3:21 am by Russ Bensing
While the prosecutor was cross-examining Mr. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 8:51 am by Eric
Because a technical background is required for patent prosecution, perhaps “hard IP” implicitly cross-references “hard sciences. [read post]
13 Nov 2021, 9:10 pm by Sophia Tang
For example, Boa Barges As v Nanjing Yichun Shipbuilding concerned a dispute worth nearly $50,000,000.[4] The contract originally included a clause to resolve disputes in London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA) and to apply English law. [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 3:15 am by familoo
(There is also a requirement that the people concerned have to be personally connected, which is defined. [read post]