Search for: "People v. Grant"
Results 3601 - 3620
of 16,980
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Mar 2010, 5:52 pm
The command will send a chill through most reasonable people. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 9:00 pm
” A trial court granted the motion to suppress. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 1:59 pm
Following the sex.com case from the Ninth Circuit, it is taken for granted that domain names are property that can be converted, sold, transferred, or subject to a creditor’s collection efforts. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 11:23 am
The case relates to a shooting in the Milwaukee area that killed four people and wounded four others. [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 8:53 am
Importantly, the Upper Tribunal’s decisions on whether to grant permission or leave to appeal are “excluded decisions”. [read post]
24 Jun 2008, 3:05 pm
Bell and Harbison v. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 9:22 am
” Simcox v. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 9:22 am
” Simcox v. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 4:13 am
Co. v. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 3:14 am
The saga of State v. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 9:00 pm
In the dissenting opinion, Justice Breyer does not take this need for balance for granted. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 1:35 pm
Florida and Sullivan v. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 1:53 pm
(See People v. [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 9:46 pm
(Orin Kerr) I’ve blogged a lot about the Ninth Circuit’s en banc case in United States v. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 5:38 am
Ct. 2900 (2014) (granting certiorari). [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 3:00 pm
Maples v. [read post]
29 Nov 2007, 1:14 am
Perez
Subscription Required
NASSAU COUNTYCriminal Practice
Court Denies Motion to Suppress Statements; Defendant Should Know Facts Adduced at Hearing
People v. [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 1:39 am
Subscription Required BRONX COUNTY Criminal Practice Drugs, Money Found in Car's Magnetic Key Holder Suppressed; Detective Exceeded Scope of Intrusion People v. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 1:50 am
Permission was only granted for one of the grounds, that the refusal to accept the IWGB’s application for recognition for the purposes of collective bargaining was in violation of art 11. [read post]
15 Aug 2008, 11:38 am
Gun advocates, it would seem, are emboldened in the wake of D.C. v. [read post]
