Search for: "People v. Mays" Results 3601 - 3620 of 39,096
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Feb 2014, 10:29 am
The landowner's actions relying on a valid permit must be so substantial that the municipal action results in serious loss rendering the improvements essentially valueless" (Town of Orangetown v Magee, 88 NY2d at 47-48; see Glacial Aggregates LLC v Town of Yorkshire, 14 NY3d at 136; People v Miller, 304 NY at 109; Matter of RC Enters. v Town of Patterson, 42 AD3d at 544; People ex rel. [read post]
27 May 2023, 8:22 am by Eric Goldman
May 22, 2023) The post Class Certification Denied Over Rightsowners’ Demands for Content ID Access–Schneider v. [read post]
2 May 2013, 12:57 pm by Adam Gillette
People with a keen grasp of legal history may recall that from the time that the United States Supreme Court decided Furman v. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 10:00 am by Grace Feldman
The California Court of Appeal ruled yesterday in People v. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 4:30 am by Darryl Hutcheson, Matrix
Second, an applicant may be vulnerable notwithstanding any available support ([69]). [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 5:00 am by Will Baude
Unsurprisingly, people may bristle at such compulsion. [read post]
3 Aug 2013, 12:06 pm by Venkat
AmayaCrass and Offensive Tweets by Student May not Justify Suspension -- Rosario v. [read post]