Search for: "Persons v. Jones" Results 3601 - 3620 of 3,905
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Aug 2008, 4:58 pm
Plaintiff, Deborah Harrison, personal representative of the estate of Charles Kevin Jones, brought suit pursuant to 42 U.S.C. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 1:25 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: CAFC sets strict standards to establish inequitable conduct: Star Scientific v R J Reynolds Tobacco: (Hal Wegner), (Maryland Intellectual Property Law Blog), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (Patently-O), (more from Patently-O), (Philip Brooks), (Law360), (I/P Updates), Safe harbour ruling in Io v Veoh could help YouTube in Viacom… [read post]
15 Aug 2008, 2:28 pm
Jones, January 24, 2002 (unpublished), a homebuilder was pursuing tortious interference claims against a dissatisfied customer. [read post]
11 Aug 2008, 1:44 pm
Accordingly, although the voluntary consent of a party who has authority over the premises renders the warrantless entry of a person's home by law enforcement personnel constitutionally valid, see, e.g., Matlock, 415 U.S. at 169-71, exceptions to the warrant requirement are "jealously and carefully drawn," Jones v. [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 3:02 pm
  The winner, of course, is the person with the largest portfolio when the game ends. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 8:23 am
    Instead, we could write: "In Smith v. [read post]
1 Aug 2008, 6:12 am
  Or given a medal for not killing an innocent person. [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 2:25 pm
The personal injury suit against Cheryl K Inc. was filed in the Galveston County 212th District Court on July 25. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 5:14 pm
Thus, as a matter of law, Aris did not have a duty of care to the Clarks and the trial court properly granted summary judgment in Aris's favor.Jacob Jones v. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 5:00 am
  This balance was sorely tested in a meticulously analyzed decision in United States v. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 9:14 pm
Godin, No. 07-2332 To obtain a conviction for aggravated identity theft under 18 U.S.C. section 1028A(a)(1), the government must prove that the defendant knew that the means of identification transferred, possessed, or used during the commission of an enumerated felony belonged to another person. [read post]