Search for: "Plaintiff(s)"
Results 3601 - 3620
of 178,378
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Nov 2023, 7:45 am
The Plaintiff/Appellee, filed as the personal representative of the estates of her husband and their son, suing the Defendant/Appellant Discount Tire Co., a retail tire sales and service store. [read post]
16 Mar 2009, 5:43 am
Additionally, the plaintiff was ordered to pay the defendant’s attorney fees and costs. [read post]
13 May 2019, 5:00 am
” According to the Opinion, this matter arose out of a single vehicle accident after which there was an altercation between the Plaintiff and the driver of the Defendant's tow truck.The court reaffirmed the general rule that, in negligence matters, unless the causal connection between the Defendant’s alleged negligence and the Plaintiff’s alleged harm is so obvious as to be within the common knowledge of the average… [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 5:00 am
The Plaintiff’s expert concluded that the Plaintiff fell as a result of an allegedly dangerous unsecured, loose mat in a foreseeable pedestrian walkway. [read post]
11 Sep 2006, 1:01 am
However, some federal courts have recently determined they have no authority to award attorney's fees, because the plaintiffs failed to establish "Article III standing". [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 4:24 am
The Court’s decision relied on the following facts: Plaintiff’s “employment at S & L, [...] [read post]
13 May 2019, 12:33 pm
That detail was the plaintiff’s efforts to serve notice on the defendant of her auto accident lawsuit. [read post]
31 May 2024, 6:03 pm
The plaintiffs were Arkansas attorneys. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 5:00 am
According to the Opinion, the Plaintiff was injured in a motor vehicle accident and settled the claims against the third party tortfeasor for $15,000.00.At the time of the accident, the Plaintiff was operating her mother’s vehicle. [read post]
15 Aug 2016, 1:09 pm
Accordingly, the ruling in favor of the plaintiffs was upheld. [read post]
15 Aug 2016, 1:09 pm
Accordingly, the ruling in favor of the plaintiffs was upheld. [read post]
7 Nov 2018, 6:45 am
Class actions are intended to allow claims to be pursued where individual plaintiffs would not be likely to pursue the claims because of the cost and complexity relative to the size of any one plaintiff’s claim. [read post]
Plaintiff's Failure to Mitigate Damages in Shreveport Accident Results in Reduction of Damages Award
7 Feb 2011, 6:34 am
For a defendant to invoke the defense of the plaintiff's failure to mitigate damages, the defendant must meet the burden of showing that: (1) the plaintiff's conduct after the injury was unreasonable; and (2) that the plaintiff's unreasonable conduct resulted in the aggravation the his harm. [read post]
19 May 2009, 4:19 pm
May 1, 2009)In a case of first impression, the Pennsylvania Superior Court ruled that a stipulation entered into by the parties under Pa.R.C.P. 1311.1 limiting a plaintiff's maximum damages to $25,000 can be withdrawn by the plaintiff at the discretion of the court in certain circumstances.Rule 1311.1 provides that, in a trial on appeal from an arbitration award, the plaintiff may enter into a stipulation to cap his or her damages at $25,000 in exchange for… [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 7:17 am
The Plaintiff’s trial lasted over two weeks. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 8:35 am
Stear, the appellate court reversed a jury’s verdict that the plaintiff failed to prove his case. [read post]
19 Sep 2009, 5:12 am
Before the Court was Defendant’s Motion to Disqualify multiple Plaintiffs in this case, brought pursuant to the FLSA, based on their failure to disclose their FLSA claims on their respective bankruptcy petitions filed within the applicable FLSA statute of limitations. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 5:07 pm
But that's not really what critics are saying. [read post]
11 Nov 2008, 12:30 pm
The plaintiff said that Whirlpool’s wholesale-times-retail calculation failed to meet Whirlpool’s burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence that there was $5 million in controversy. [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 9:12 am
The court ruled that the Plaintiff’s bad faith claim failed where the Plaintiff failed to plead sufficient facts alleging any unreasonable conduct by the carrier or any facts that would support an inference of unreasonableness with respect to the carrier’s settlement offer. [read post]
