Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court"
Results 3601 - 3620
of 9,084
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jun 2022, 6:05 am
Supreme Court held in Nestlé v. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 11:28 am
This morning, the United States Supreme Court heard oral argument in Heimeshoff v. [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 8:36 am
http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/63810-6.pub.doc.pdf Division Two Court of Appeals State v. [read post]
23 Oct 2007, 11:40 am
Further, a number of district court opinions suggest that sentencing courts may be taking a variety of post-Booker approaches to the consideration of acquitted conduct sentencing enhancements. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 3:00 am
The case of the day TracFone Wireless, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 4:35 pm
Relevant Background And The Court’s CEQA Holding For its CEQA compliance, the County prepared and relied on an addendum to the 2005 EIR certified for the first-approved, “Martis Camp” subdivision, a 2,200-acre, 650-lot gated private residential community with access to the public road and highway system via State Route (SR 267). [read post]
ID Supreme Court Concluded a Conditional Use Permit Granted Pursuant to a Void Amendment Was Invalid
13 May 2021, 12:46 pm
The district court denied the motion to dismiss, stating that late filing was due to the circumstances outside CAL’s control. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 1:57 pm
Medeva Pharma Suisse v. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 9:04 am
See A Judicial Throwdown on CEQA's Baseline Requirements. [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 5:42 am
That kind of judicial minimalism is all that would be needed in this case.__________________________* In 2004, in a dissenting opinion in Vieth v. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 5:17 am
However, the Court noted three situations (based on historical understanding) in which Congress could give judicial power to non-Article III courts: Courts for non-state areas (U.S. territories and the District of Columbia) in which Congress is acting as both local and national government. [read post]
13 Apr 2023, 11:57 am
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit in United States ex rel. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 7:47 am
” Additionally, many times, the local rules for the district courts, judicial preferences and procedures, and/or state court rules impose specific requirements for a party to outline good faith efforts taken before filing a motion to compel related to pretrial discovery. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 7:47 am
” Additionally, many times, the local rules for the district courts, judicial preferences and procedures, and/or state court rules impose specific requirements for a party to outline good faith efforts taken before filing a motion to compel related to pretrial discovery. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 7:47 am
” Additionally, many times, the local rules for the district courts, judicial preferences and procedures, and/or state court rules impose specific requirements for a party to outline good faith efforts taken before filing a motion to compel related to pretrial discovery. [read post]
14 Apr 2022, 11:39 am
Relatedly, the district court worried that the Guidance could not "be applied on a state-by-state basis. [read post]
11 May 2017, 12:59 pm
From the complaint in Myers v. [read post]
14 May 2018, 9:51 am
First, the court held tha [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 12:55 pm
Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit declined to grant an en banc rehearing in Washington v. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 4:53 pm
King and Gardiner Farms, LLC v. [read post]
