Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court"
Results 3601 - 3620
of 9,084
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jan 2018, 2:30 pm
Zolg v. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 8:00 am
These plaintiffs opposed arbitration “on First Amendment grounds” and asserted there was state action because the FAA and judicial interpretations of it encourage arbitration to the point that AT&T’s actions are attributable to the state. [read post]
28 Jan 2018, 6:40 pm
Zolg v. [read post]
27 Jan 2018, 6:32 am
The district court judge presiding over the case cited the cases disused above and dismissed the case. [read post]
26 Jan 2018, 6:38 am
On January 23, 2018, the Supreme Court of Ohio handed down a merit decision in State v. [read post]
26 Jan 2018, 6:00 am
Mathews v. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 9:00 pm
Trump celebrated his 365th day as president of the United States. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 6:00 am
Circuit precedent, first seeking to distinguish Kiyemba v. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 6:00 am
Circuit precedent, first seeking to distinguish Kiyemba v. [read post]
24 Jan 2018, 3:55 am
For the Tribune News Service (via Governing), David Savage reports that in District of Columbia v. [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 5:00 am
The first fact pattern was that of the Kidane v. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 3:16 pm
(Citing Maintain Our Desert Environment v. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 12:10 pm
As the reader may recall from other “Watch Your Language” articles for this Blog, because of this judicial deference to “commercial language”, you must say what you mean, precisely, or a judge will decide what you meant.Apparently, the plaintiffs in the recent Supreme Court of Ohio case, Alford v. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 12:10 pm
As the reader may recall from other “Watch Your Language” articles for this Blog, because of this judicial deference to “commercial language”, you must say what you mean, precisely, or a judge will decide what you meant.Apparently, the plaintiffs in the recent Supreme Court of Ohio case, Alford v. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 11:34 am
The case is about whether challenges to a federal regulation known as the “waters of the United States” rule must be filed in federal district courts. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 10:00 am
In today’s edition, the whiplash happens in both state and federal court.In Caffey v. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 6:34 am
” (The court also denied the motion to certify state-law questions to the state high court, and conditionally certify the FLSA claims.). [read post]
21 Jan 2018, 8:14 pm
However, the United States District Court, District of Columbia did state in United States v. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 2:13 pm
Mattis habeas litigation in federal district court in D.C. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 11:40 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit’s judgment and instruct that court to remand the case to the district court with directions to dismiss all claims for prospective relief regarding pregnant unaccompanied minors. [read post]
