Search for: "State v. Powers"
Results 3601 - 3620
of 36,676
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Feb 2024, 8:24 pm
If somebody is powerful, if somebody is popular, then we don’t have rule of law anymore. [read post]
18 Jun 2006, 2:23 am
Wade in the United States? [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 7:22 am
States have broad autonomy in structuring their governments and pursuing legislative objectives; the Tenth Amendment reserves to states “the power to regulate elections. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 12:42 pm
Those Justices relied on the Slaughter-House Cases, as well as the 1876 case of United States v. [read post]
5 Sep 2017, 12:29 pm
(People v. [read post]
27 Mar 2007, 8:30 am
In an amicus filing in the case of Medellin v. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 5:08 am
Harper:Members of this Court last discussed the outer bounds of state court review in the present context in Bush v. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 12:58 am
In this paper, I examine whether, in light of its decision in Kennedy v. [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 5:59 am
ComerToday's brief is of Kennedy v. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 4:30 am
Shah v. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 6:06 am
Indeed, the case may be seen as one prong of a multi-faceted push to democratize the power that remains concentrated in an outdated and unrepresentative Security Council. [read post]
11 May 2011, 1:00 pm
ARTICLE V The requested Party shall not be bound to extradite its own nationals, but it shall have the power to extradite them in its discretion. [read post]
28 Oct 2009, 6:51 am
American Electric Power Co., allowing a group of states and land trusts to proceed with a so-called global warming tort suit. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 11:07 am
S. 606 et seq.; United States v. [read post]
11 Mar 2009, 8:33 am
The case is Cuomo v. [read post]
21 Dec 2007, 6:50 pm
Hunter v. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 1:02 am
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).During oral arguments in American Electric Power Co. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2007, 11:23 am
Yes, Bush v. [read post]
11 Jul 2009, 9:43 am
" Citing Plett v. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 12:39 am
To do otherwise, according to the decision, would vest states with "veto power" over such projects.The Jefferson County case involved the same issue - stream flow levels - but that case, according to the dissent, "[gave] the States precisely the veto power over hydroelectric projects that [the court] determined in California v. [read post]
