Search for: "T-UP v. Consumer Protection"
Results 3601 - 3620
of 4,765
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Oct 2011, 3:00 pm
At first glance, Monday’s cases seem very different: first up was Douglas v. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 12:32 pm
Victor Stanley, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 8:25 am
That was the question asked of the court in Hernandez v. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 6:39 am
Sovereign Military Hospitaller Order of Saint John of Jerusalem of Rhodes and of Malta v. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 8:42 pm
By way of contrast, today’s antitrust analysis of alleged exclusionary conduct begins with (ironically enough) the U.S. v. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 7:56 pm
CCA and B, LLC v. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 2:49 pm
By way of contrast, today’s antitrust analysis of alleged exclusionary conduct begins with (ironically enough) the U.S. v. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 2:45 pm
But since the Mental Capacity Act 2005, it would be dreadful advice, as under the Act nobody is vested with the authority to enter into a contract on somebody else’s behalf unless a) they have a lasting power of attorney; b) they are appointed a property/affairs deputy by the court; c) the Court of Protection authorises the contract.But none of these are easy options.A person without capacity can’t usually enter an LPA, and either of the other two options require a… [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 2:45 pm
But since the Mental Capacity Act 2005, it would be dreadful advice, as under the Act nobody is vested with the authority to enter into a contract on somebody else’s behalf unless a) they have a lasting power of attorney; b) they are appointed a property/affairs deputy by the court; c) the Court of Protection authorises the contract.But none of these are easy options.A person without capacity can’t usually enter an LPA, and either of the other two options require a… [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 7:49 am
Thus, the First Amendment protects all media, while parents have a variety of tools available to them to limit what content their kids can consume, or games they can play. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 7:42 pm
Supreme Court began hearing arguments Wednesday in Golan v. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 5:37 pm
So the jurisdiction of the ASA is underwritten by recourse to statutory intervention to protect consumers. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 8:48 pm
In Stolt-Nielsen S.A. v. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 6:17 pm
Again, the impact will likely go well beyond the satellite companies and reach the broad range of businesses, government agencies and consumers who have come to rely on increasingly higher quality geospatial data.Impact of privacy legislation and regulation on geolocation - I have written extensively about how geolocation information is being caught up in global efforts to protect consumer privacy. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 5:00 pm
The Arizona Supreme Court currently has under review a mortgage documentation case, Vasquez v. [read post]
1 Oct 2011, 12:40 pm
by Eric Goldman Facebook, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 6:37 am
You can’t [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 6:31 am
Servedio v. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 2:44 am
It doesn't matter that we're protected by law. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 1:28 pm
Registered design protection lasts for up to 25 years and would give SuperGroup the exclusive right to exploit their design and prevent unauthorised copying. [read post]
