Search for: "USA v. Doe"
Results 3601 - 3620
of 4,128
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Nov 2009, 10:19 am
Corrections USA, supra (quoting U.S. v. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 1:17 am
Murphy Oil USA (here). [read post]
3 Nov 2009, 5:16 am
Turkmen v. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 8:57 am
In SKF USA v. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 1:41 am
Indústria e Comércio v OHIM, Consorci de l'Espai Rural de Gallecs (Class 46) CFI: John Deere prevails before CFI with colour combination mark: BCS v OHIM, Deere (Class 46) (IPKat) CFI finds trademarks containing common element in identical font confusingly similar in Aldi Einkauf GmbH & Co v Goya Importaciones y Distribuciones (Class 46) CFI: RNAiFect and RNActive: who would get confused? [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 1:41 am
Indústria e Comércio v OHIM, Consorci de l'Espai Rural de Gallecs (Class 46) CFI: John Deere prevails before CFI with colour combination mark: BCS v OHIM, Deere (Class 46) (IPKat) CFI finds trademarks containing common element in identical font confusingly similar in Aldi Einkauf GmbH & Co v Goya Importaciones y Distribuciones (Class 46) CFI: RNAiFect and RNActive: who would get confused? [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 1:41 am
Indústria e Comércio v OHIM, Consorci de l'Espai Rural de Gallecs (Class 46) CFI: John Deere prevails before CFI with colour combination mark: BCS v OHIM, Deere (Class 46) (IPKat) CFI finds trademarks containing common element in identical font confusingly similar in Aldi Einkauf GmbH & Co v Goya Importaciones y Distribuciones (Class 46) CFI: RNAiFect and RNActive: who would get confused? [read post]
1 Nov 2009, 7:00 pm
A sports spectator assumes similar risks as does a sports participant. [35] Courts usually conclude that a “spectator has a duty to protect himself or herself not only against the dangers of which he or she has actual knowledge but also against such dangers incident to the game as would be apparent to a reasonable person in the exercise of due care. [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 4:06 pm
October 31, 2009 – A summary review of environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
30 Oct 2009, 7:14 am
That premise does not extend to private gun ownership under Heller. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 6:25 am
Medico (Filewrapper) BPAI finds claim indefinite and not directed to patentable subject under Bilski: Ex parte Hemmat (GRAY On Claims) District Court N D Illinois: KSR obviousness does not require prior art from the same field: Se-Kure Controls, Inc v Diam USA, Inc (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) District Court E D Texas finds plaintiff has standing; agreement transfers ownership and simultaneously a conditional purchase by transferor from transferee: Balsam… [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 5:25 am
(IP Osgoode) Changing trends in grant of temporary injunctions in IP cases (Spicy IP) Ireland Irish make IP-friendly amendments to Finance Act (IP finance) Israel Israel Supreme Court allows generic Apropo snack (IP Factor) Does a mark give rights to an opposite word by association? [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 5:25 am
(IP Osgoode) Changing trends in grant of temporary injunctions in IP cases (Spicy IP) Ireland Irish make IP-friendly amendments to Finance Act (IP finance) Israel Israel Supreme Court allows generic Apropo snack (IP Factor) Does a mark give rights to an opposite word by association? [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 4:58 am
Cicle v. [read post]
24 Oct 2009, 8:27 am
In Bormann v. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 4:12 pm
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. and related cases) (2009 U.S. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 6:49 am
Florida and Sullivan v. [read post]
21 Oct 2009, 1:12 pm
Comer v. [read post]
21 Oct 2009, 3:50 am
Se-Kure Controls, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Oct 2009, 10:06 pm
A similar question was recently considered by the Southern District in Victoria Secrets Brand Management v. [read post]
