Search for: "United States v. Cores"
Results 3601 - 3620
of 4,011
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Mar 2010, 5:36 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 3:56 pm
United States v. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 3:17 pm
This Settlement Agreement proposes to compromise a claim the United States has at this Site for Past Response Costs, as those terms are defined in the Settlement Agreement. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 10:08 am
Well, um, in Miles v. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 10:00 pm
United States, — U.S. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 3:01 pm
Further, the United States Supreme Court has recognized that "state laws that conflict with federal law are 'without effect.' " Altria Group, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 5:54 am
Section 233(a) of Title 42 of the United States Code provides that recovery against the United States under the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA) “shall be exclusive of any other civil action or proceeding” in cases seeking damages for injuries resulting from medical treatment provided by an employee of the U.S. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 3:44 pm
(Rees v United Kingdom, para 49; Sheffield and Horsham v United Kingdom, para 66; see also Cossey v United Kingdom, paras 43, 46; I v United Kingdom (GC), para 78; Jaremowicz v Poland, para 48 ('right of a man and a woman to marry')) The historical analysis of the original intent behind Article 12 doesn't help. [read post]
27 Feb 2010, 3:23 pm
Judge Lourie's patent decisions do not bear the good seal of the future in our book.Guttag's reasoning reminded us of the core logic in Lab Corp v. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 6:52 am
Humanitarian Law Project and United States v. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 5:30 am
” Bank of United States v. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 6:00 am
However, the validity of the California decision has been questioned by the 2008 United States Supreme Court’s ruling, which held that a defendant had a right to demand live testimony at trial from crime lab technicians who actually performed their tests. [read post]
20 Feb 2010, 7:24 am
Among the cases the Supreme Court of the United States will soon decide are the following cases with issues of public interest. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 12:03 am
Hall, ed., Oxford Companion to the Supreme Court of the United States (New York: Oxford Univ. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 8:34 am
We have no intention of wading into the treacherous (and heated) debate about Citizens United v. [read post]
14 Feb 2010, 6:41 pm
Following the emails’ release, more than 1,700 scientists from the United Kingdom signed a statement responding “to the ongoing questioning of core climate science and methods. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 12:15 pm
” United States v. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 4:13 pm
Supreme Court opinion in Massachusetts v. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 3:00 pm
In a Statement of Interest filed with the court on February 4, the Justice Department said: “Although the United States believes the parties have approached this effort in good faith and the amended settlement agreement is more circumscribed in its sweep than the original proposed settlement, the amended settlement agreement suffers from the same core problem as the original agreement: it is an attempt to use the class action mechanism to implement forward-looking… [read post]
4 Feb 2010, 3:05 am
PERB reverts to its earlier “past-practice” analysis in determining “unit work”Matter of Manhasset Union Free School Dist. v New York State Pub. [read post]
