Search for: "United States v. David"
Results 3601 - 3620
of 6,867
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am
General Motors Corp., 575 P.2d 1162, 1168-69 (Cal. 1978); see State Dept. of Health Services v. [read post]
4 Apr 2007, 8:26 am
The United States' petition on the same set of rules asserted different grounds and could be successful. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 3:08 am
Newman ; directed by Jonny Campbell, David Kew and Andy Hay. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 11:37 am
These handguns, from companies such as Ruger, Smith & Wesson, Springfield, or Glock, are the most common defensive firearms in the United States; under the Supreme Court's decision in District of Columbia v. [read post]
2 Jan 2020, 9:01 pm
United States, the most famous Court opinion involving an impeachment case. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 10:05 pm
., v. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 3:44 pm
Justice Rothstein stated as follows in the CBC v. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 3:11 am
Corporations » United States » Accounting. [read post]
3 Oct 2015, 5:34 am
Michael Knapp provided a primer on United States v. [read post]
31 Mar 2022, 10:00 am
The United States District Court for the Southern District of New York recently addressed the issue of novelty as an element of an idea theft claim in Wexler v Hasbro. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 11:01 am
Judge David J. [read post]
17 Nov 2016, 4:13 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 7:25 am
Regrettably, the scam phenomenon is not exclusive to trade marks and designs, explains David in this post, after receiving a message from the mysterious “European Patent Organization”.* Hurray for judicial sense on product by process claims- Birss triumphs in Hospira v GenentechThis note from Darren is about Hospira v Genentech [on which see the IPKat note here], a pharma-patent case that Mr Justice Birss has decided in light of product-by-process claims. [read post]
13 May 2011, 8:00 am
The lawsuit asks that the court “Declare that the prolonged seizure of [David’s] laptop computer and other electronic devices and the review, copying, retention and dissemination of their contents without reasonable suspicion violates the Fourth and First Amendments to the United States Constitution. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 4:12 am
Heasley).Non-ownership: Opposer claimed that the mark was used in the United States not by Applicant Fan, but by JY Instyle, a California corporation, and therefore that JY Insyle owned the mark, not Fan. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 12:27 pm
Brief of the United States, U.S. v. [read post]
8 Dec 2007, 10:21 am
Omar had not been convicted of a crime, Judge David S. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 7:42 pm
The United State Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
29 Jun 2021, 11:14 am
United States, 148 Fed. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 11:39 am
To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes; In United States v. [read post]
