Search for: "United States v. Fields" Results 3601 - 3620 of 5,961
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Dec 2011, 5:29 pm by Lloyd J. Jassin
  By way of background, the publisher filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York on December 23, 2011, against eBook publisher, Open Road Integrated Media. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 5:29 pm by Lloyd J. Jassin
  By way of background, the publisher filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York on December 23, 2011, against eBook publisher, Open Road Integrated Media. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 5:46 pm by Theodore Harvatin
However, the Unites States Supreme Court, in McNeely v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 8:06 am by Guest Author
United States, litigants have also asked the Court to find presidential removal powers and immunities that lack an explicit basis in the Constitution’s text. [read post]
24 Jan 2009, 10:26 am
Biological Paternity Isn't Determinative - Cornelio v. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 10:45 am by John Elwood
United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
24 Jan 2016, 4:16 pm by INFORRM
On 19 January 2016, the Court of Appeal handed down judgment in R (Miranda) v Secretary of State for the Home Department ([2016] EWCA Civ 6). [read post]
13 May 2014, 8:36 am by WIMS
Climate Report - The average temperature for the contiguous United States during April was 51.7°F, 0.7°F above the 20th century average. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 9:15 pm by Kirk Jenkins
Our reports on the civil oral arguments of the Illinois Supreme Court's November term conclude with Poris v. [read post]
22 Jul 2017, 5:06 pm by Jeff Gamso
"A pardon is an act of grace," wrote John Marshall in United States v. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 9:15 pm by Kirk Jenkins
Our reports on the civil oral arguments of the Illinois Supreme Court's November term conclude with Poris v. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 5:01 am
 The citation is R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the EU [2016] EWHC 2768 (Admin). [read post]
20 May 2016, 6:54 am by Joy Waltemath
The NLRA does not expressly preempt state law, nor did the parties argue that enforcement of the HRL conflicts with federal law—rather, the DFR has been held to preempt state laws because “[a] union’s rights and duties as the exclusive bargaining agent in carrying out its representational functions” comprise an area in which “Congress has occupied the field and closed it to state regulation. [read post]