Search for: "United States v. Mannings" Results 3601 - 3620 of 6,942
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 May 2014, 11:37 am by Jane Chong
The interim president of Ukraine, Oleksandr V. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 5:55 am by Margaret Wood
  In the United States, it has only been staged in New York four times, but the play has been staged more frequently in England – most recently in 2004. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 7:05 am
A State, then, which violated its own contract was suable in the courts of the United States for that violation. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 9:03 pm by Lyle Denniston
  At 11 a.m., the Court will hear a federal case, United States v. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 10:11 am by Robert Percival
Korzen, director of the Appellate Advocacy Clinic at the Wake Forest University School of Law, will make his Supreme Court debut in CTS Corp. v. [read post]
21 Apr 2014, 5:26 am
 In 2013, the United States sought to obtain certain information about a target in a criminal investigation. [read post]
20 Apr 2014, 5:28 am by John H Curley
" It also argued that because the cba used the terms spouse as well as significant other, those terms should be interpreted to be interchangeable.Arbitrator Sarah R Cole has issued an award, relying on the Supreme Court's decision in United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2014, 12:20 pm
A decision issued yesterday by the United States Court of Appeals here in Atlanta shows how even good laws like the CVRA can sometimes lead to bad consequences. [read post]
18 Apr 2014, 9:28 am by Kristen Fries
The United States District Court for the District of Columbia declared each of Alice’s patents invalid for not defining patent-eligible subject matter. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 4:26 pm by Barbara E. Lichman, Ph.D., J.D.
  Third, FAA takes the position that “there are no shades of gray in FAA regulations,” and, thus, anyone who wants to fly, manned or unmanned in the United States airspace needs some level of FAA approval. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 7:36 am by Jeff Welty
It’s uncharted territory, but I seriously doubt that pervasive and persistent surveillance of that nature comports with the Fourth Amendment as interpreted by the Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]