Search for: "United States v. Stevens" Results 3601 - 3620 of 4,056
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jan 2024, 2:15 pm by Michael Lowe
We have recorded 2,403 communities using identity disclosure versus 2,196 reverse sting operations in cities and counties across the United States. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 9:14 pm
Stevens, No. 05-2497 Conviction for selling depictions of animal cruelty is vacated, and the statute itself, 18 U.S.C. section 48, is declared unconstitutional, where: 1) the criminalization of depictions of animal cruelty, rather than of the acts of cruelty themselves, is a content-based regulation on speech; 2) the speech in question does not constitute a new category of unprotected speech; and 3) the government has not shown that the statute is narrowly tailored, using the least… [read post]
1 Jan 2023, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
One cannot answer that question strictly as a matter of public policy because the First Amendment right to free speech places limits on government’s power to make lying a crime.In United States v. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 5:08 am by Brian A. Comer
Risperdal is different from other antipsychotic medicines and “doctors needed to know that,” he added.Jurors will begin deliberating the case tomorrow.The case is State of South Carolina v. [read post]
30 Oct 2007, 1:11 pm
As Justice Stevens recently observed, it is only the presence of so many very conservative Justices that makes the moderate Justices appear liberal. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 6:32 am by James Bickford
”  The cert. petitions in that case, United States v. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 6:00 am by Maxwell Kennerly
United States et al., Civil Action 02-2010, United States District Court for the District of Columbia. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 1:50 pm by Barbara Moreno
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES 38. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 4:22 am by SHG
  Via Doug Berman, his decision in United States v. [read post]
3 May 2017, 2:30 am by Nicandro Iannacci
One major argument is the corporate critique, powerfully articulated by Justice John Paul Stevens in his lengthy dissent to the Court’s 2010 decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 10:40 am by Heather Gerken
One of the key questions at stake is whether Section 5 imposes a heavy burden on the states (an important step in evaluating whether Section 5 is “congruent and proportional,” to use the City of Boerne v. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 4:21 pm by JB
This is a great day for civil liberties in the United States! [read post]