Search for: "We Don't Judge - We Defend"
Results 3601 - 3620
of 6,888
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jun 2008, 1:15 pm
"You're looking at a long sentence if you don't. [read post]
8 Aug 2010, 9:53 am
Competent doctors don't need to be hyper-educated savants whose heads are crammed with medical knowledge; they simply need to be modest and conscientious followers of medical protocols to avoid committing most medical errors. [read post]
22 Apr 2012, 4:08 pm
However, I must say that I don't see the courts applying the case in this manner. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 5:42 am
He would have to convince the Court that the trial judge made a mistake by not granting his original motion to sever under Rule 14(b)(1)(B)’s “to promote a fair determination of the defendant's guilt or innocence. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 4:45 am
I don't think so. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 3:49 am
And they don't. [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 8:05 am
"- So don't convict someone who is innocent! [read post]
9 May 2011, 6:13 am
Maybe they don't present certain witnesses, maybe they even admit their negligence in court, but a good defense attorney is going to try to downplay this impact. [read post]
17 May 2010, 8:53 pm
We're starting to see them bring advocacy back into sentencing, and give defendants—even defendants who put the Government to its proof at trial and lose—a shot at more rational sentences. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 2:12 pm
Eighth Circuit: We don't have to decide if that seemingly crystal clear speedy-trial violation would have helped you, because you waived your right to appeal that as part of the plea deal. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 3:08 pm
However, it doesn't mean that we as consumers will find Yelp trustworthy. [read post]
19 Sep 2020, 2:03 am
But that wouldn't be easy to do, given what Judge Gonzalez Rogers wrote in her TRO order. [read post]
24 May 2009, 10:45 am
Under this definition, it doesn't save a defendant to insist that the viewer or reader of the pornographic material was an adult audience whose viewing or reading was entirely voluntary. [read post]
27 Feb 2011, 1:39 pm
Which is why I say that I don't believe in the Law. [read post]
21 Aug 2008, 5:00 am
As much as possible, I don't want to varnish things in this blog. [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 11:30 am
(Also, technically, we don’t have any “losers” this week; sorry, DT.) [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 10:19 am
The defendant doesn't get the decisive win it expected on that point. [read post]
24 May 2007, 10:40 am
Even federal judges, many of whom arrive steeped in the system of state common law, are not immune to this reaction.We don't think that's right, but we're realists enough to know that it happens. [read post]
22 Oct 2008, 10:30 am
In other words, the concern here is that the original, taken-out-of-context statements will so influence the jury the defendant won't be able to change their minds -- to convince them that the statements were taken out of context and so don't mean what they seem to mean. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 2:42 pm
But traditional marriage laws do no such thing; under these laws, persons of any sexual orientation are wholly free to marry if they so choose.I don't think that this definitional argument is an adequate response to the class legislation claim. [read post]
