Search for: "v. JONES"
Results 3601 - 3620
of 9,905
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jul 2018, 7:06 am
The Supreme Court (Lord Lloyd-Jones, with whom Lady Hale, Lord Mance, Lord Kerr and Lord Wilson agreed) unanimously allowed the Commissioner’s appeal. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 6:26 pm
Jones, James C. [read post]
20 May 2011, 5:36 am
After being widely criticized for his handling of a criminal case, a lawyer is now suing his critics by the dozen, including a raft of leading law bloggers; the case is already being dubbed “Rakofsky v. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 3:16 am
The Magna v. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 1:53 pm
Applying the teaching of Rawlings to the facts of this case, we must uphold Officer Jones's search of the car. [read post]
4 May 2007, 11:00 am
Vasquez, S141753 Jones v. [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 8:14 am
Jones, 2009 Ohio 5701, 2009 Ohio App. [read post]
23 Feb 2007, 9:00 pm
Vasquez, and S141753 Jones v. [read post]
10 Jan 2009, 12:14 pm
United States v. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 7:00 pm
In another case, F&G Delivery Ltd. v. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 10:27 am
Alberstone v. [read post]
28 May 2007, 7:16 am
Jones, 2007 Tenn. [read post]
22 May 2009, 4:10 am
Eagerly awaited and just out today is the UK High Court's decision in L'Oréal v eBay [2009] EWHC 1094 (Ch). [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 3:26 am
Di Giacomo v Michael S. [read post]
25 Feb 2022, 3:53 pm
From Sullivan v. [read post]
14 May 2014, 11:45 am
Riley On May 7, 2014, the First Circuit issued its decision in Jones, et al. v. [read post]
27 Aug 2013, 7:30 am
Finding that a former university dean failed to establish that he was fired because he followed the school’s sexual assault policy in investigating a student’s claims that she was sexually assaulted by two football players, the Iowa Supreme Court affirmed summary judgment on the dean’s wrongful discharge claim (Jones v University of Iowa, August 23, 2013, Zager, B). [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 5:01 am
From the Fifth Circuit's decision Thursday in Torrey v. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 7:11 am
In Jones v. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 8:15 am
The following response in our symposium on Kiobel v. [read post]
