Search for: "BROWN v. BROWN" Results 3621 - 3640 of 12,891
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Feb 2011, 11:12 am by Alfred Brophy
Board of Education, called The Ghost of Jim Crow: How Southern Moderates Used Brown v. [read post]
28 Aug 2010, 12:50 am by INFORRM
In Lloyds Bank plc v Rogers ([1996] EWCA Civ 1277), Simon Brown LJ noted that “The correctness of Hilbery J’s decision in Davidson has been doubted and never yet tested. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 4:11 am by Nedim Malovic
For instance, in Ardagh Metal Beverage Holdings GmbH & Co KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) (T-668/19), EU: T:2021:420, the EU General Court considered that, the assessment of the distinctiveness of sound marks has to be made as to the ‘resonance’ of the mark and is not subject to a ‘significant departure of the norm’ test developed for, eg, shape marks.In the present case, the fact that shades or nuances ranging from copper to… [read post]
12 Feb 2008, 10:34 pm
This debate happened to come just a few days after I taught Brown v. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 8:37 pm by Josh Wright
Commissioner Rosch makes the case for cert in FTC v. [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 1:48 pm by Anthony Zaller
In this Friday’s Five I discuss: new case decision on vacation pay and policies (Minnick v. [read post]
15 Jan 2011, 7:34 am by Alfred Brophy
 Read Brown-Nagin in conjunction with Anders Walker's The Ghost of Jim Crow: How Southern Moderates Used Brown v. [read post]
25 Jan 2023, 6:45 am by Tom Smith
” But one need not speculate — originalists consistently support the result in Brown; in Rutan v. [read post]
6 Aug 2007, 8:58 am
Supreme Court combined into its landmark Brown v. [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 4:05 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
Two weeks ago, in Capizzi v Brown Chiari LLP, 2019 NY Slip Op 51471(U) [Sup Ct, Erie County Sept. 13, 2019], a dispute between a law firm partner and his former colleagues, raising the identical issue as D’Amato & Lynch, reached its climax in a highly-interesting, post-trial decision by Erie County Commercial Division Justice Timothy J. [read post]