Search for: "Claimant(s)" Results 3621 - 3640 of 26,318
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jun 2014, 11:22 am by Virginia Hunt
 The rating doctor reports the percentage to the insurer, who may then offer an award based on that percentage,  the claimant's average monthly wage, and the claimant's age. [read post]
12 Dec 2018, 12:15 pm
Claimants challenge forfeitures in just 3 percent of cases, allowing the state to seize millions’ worth of people’s property in a rigged process. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 2:37 pm by Virginia Hunt
It’s when these two criteria are not met that the workers’ compensation case begins to fall apart and the pro se claimant becomes a client. [read post]
11 Mar 2021, 11:17 am by Friedman, Rodman & Frank, P.A.
The current system allows a claimants insurance company to pay the insured’s bills, regardless of their fault. [read post]
29 Dec 2012, 2:02 pm by Anthony Castelli
The National Organization of Social Security Claimant's Represntatives, of which I am a member, is fighting this issue with Freedom of Information requests. [read post]
4 Jan 2022, 2:24 pm
If your loved one died in some kind of preventable accident, it’s only natural to want to hold the liable party accountable. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:04 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Claimant's allegation of impropriety amounts to nothing more than an allegation of corruption, which is insufficient to overcome judicial immunity (Rosenstein v State of New York, 37 AD3d 208, 208-209 [1st Dept 2007]; Tarter v State of New York, 68 NY2d 511, 518 [1986]; Sassower, 96 AD2d at 586), and no exception to application of the doctrine (Alvarez v Snyder, 264 AD2d 27, 34 [1st Dept 2000]; see Sassower, 96 AD2d at 586-587) is present here. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:04 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Claimant's allegation of impropriety amounts to nothing more than an allegation of corruption, which is insufficient to overcome judicial immunity (Rosenstein v State of New York, 37 AD3d 208, 208-209 [1st Dept 2007]; Tarter v State of New York, 68 NY2d 511, 518 [1986]; Sassower, 96 AD2d at 586), and no exception to application of the doctrine (Alvarez v Snyder, 264 AD2d 27, 34 [1st Dept 2000]; see Sassower, 96 AD2d at 586-587) is present here. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 6:00 am by Caitlin Byars
Popich successfully rebutted the presumption in favor of the Claimant: the ALJ determined Claimants credibility was questionable, and his testimony was inconsistent. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 4:14 am by Gene Killian
 The New Jersey Supremes, for example,  dealt with a question often posed by our clients in construction defect cases: Namely, can a claimant proceed directly against a defendant’s insurance company? [read post]
12 Sep 2017, 4:40 am by INFORRM
Overall, Davis LJ concluded “I would accept the principal argument advanced by the claimant in the Respondent’s Notice. [read post]
28 Jan 2012, 9:29 pm
The claimants, who were formerly employed by the financial firm, contend that they did not receive fair compensation for transactions involving an institutional investor client. [read post]
21 May 2018, 8:55 am by Amy Howe
” The question now before the court is whether that 25-percent cap applies only to attorney’s fees for representing a claimant in court or also to fees for representing a claimant before the Social Security Administration. [read post]
22 Sep 2017, 9:31 am by Michael O. Smith
The one caveat is that a Boston workers’ compensation claimant must be considered an “employee” at the time of their injury, or at the time they suffered their medical symptoms. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 6:01 am by Jason A. Newfield
The Court took issue with Met Life's claim posture, seeking to apply the limited pay period for a mental health claim, when Met Life took this position several years after the claim had been filed, and while in litigation. [read post]