Search for: "Commitment of M B"
Results 3621 - 3640
of 3,692
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Apr 2007, 7:24 am
I'm actually not opposed to a presidential pardon power, but we should note that it is in fact subject to abuse, whether or not there is a legal remedy for such abuse. [read post]
5 Apr 2007, 7:16 am
Under Evidence Code Section 1101(b), and due to several California Supreme Court rulings, more and more prior bad acts of defendants are now admitted for purposes of proving that they committed the present offense.A couple of years ago I had a murder case that was a "whodunnit. [read post]
4 Apr 2007, 3:41 pm
A tiered system for sex offenders based on risk levels is optimal and I’m glad the state is taking a step in the right direction. [read post]
4 Apr 2007, 7:55 am
A better phrase is, "I'm behind on my mortgage payments," which is a factual statement about your account.] [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 12:07 am
I say that because if they're not playing "gotcha," I'd think they'd just run criminal histories without creating an agency-wide disturbance.Another possibility, one I'm willing to concede as plausible, is that management doesn't know what it's doing. [read post]
2 Apr 2007, 10:58 am
Finally I'm getting around to going through the House Criminal Jurisprudence Committee agenda for tomorrow, and I find that three bills I really like aimed at reducing local jail overcrowding are all on the agenda:Smart approaches to reduce local jail overcrowdingHB 3059 by Peña and HB 2391 by Madden are similar bills, each authorizing officers to "cite and summons" certain Class B and a handful of non-violent A misdemeanors (for… [read post]
1 Apr 2007, 11:24 am
I'm starting to hear about this trend. [read post]
30 Mar 2007, 7:23 am
I'm not a lawyer, so others must judge whether the bill succeeds on that score. [read post]
29 Mar 2007, 6:33 pm
I’m not sure what that would be…but I’ll wait till the public hearing to form an opinion. [read post]
29 Mar 2007, 6:19 am
"As for Orrick's commitment to London, you have to realize you're in it for the long haul. [read post]
25 Mar 2007, 6:09 am
If approved, the bill would allow admission into court of any evidence that might shed light on a defendant's "character," instead of whether they committed any specific offense. [read post]
25 Mar 2007, 12:43 am
Given that context, I don't understand a) why Hughes' bill wouldn't violate the HCR 96 moratorim, and b) what these newly empowered police officers would investigate if HB 488 passes. [read post]
19 Mar 2007, 3:55 pm
This is amisdemeanor, punishable by up to a year's imprisonment or a fine of $2,500, or both. 720 ILCS 5/12-5(b); 730 ILCS 5/5-8-3(a)(1), 5/5-9-1(a)(2). [read post]
19 Mar 2007, 9:11 am
Opinion by Chief Judge Robert M. [read post]
16 Mar 2007, 10:35 am
Or do we say: You have commited a vile crime and taken human life in a cruel manner. [read post]
15 Mar 2007, 8:09 am
(b) A sentence should be appropriate for the offense committed and the defendant being sentenced.That's not only an excellent statement of the goals of criminal sentencing, it also makes for a nice intro into some of the other critical bills coming up that follow it. [read post]
11 Mar 2007, 1:26 pm
When Richard M. [read post]
11 Mar 2007, 11:22 am
Ok, I know I'm just an economist. [read post]
4 Mar 2007, 9:53 pm
I'm sure there are other examples, but its the first federal case I've seen that includes a screen name in the case caption. [read post]
4 Mar 2007, 6:03 pm
Companies care more about their bottom line than jail time - at least Class B jail time. [read post]
