Search for: "Cross v. State"
Results 3621 - 3640
of 16,698
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Oct 2019, 9:30 am
Huawei (consolidated with Conversant v. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 11:57 am
In the past, many have observed anecdotally and cynically that even after many years of deliberation and millions of dollars in legal and expert fees often expended, the tariff at the end of the day has often the simple arithmetical average of the amounts proposed by the proponent and opponent(s) +/– a few percent.However, that pattern, if it was ever true, has been changing and the Board has issued some surprising and encouraging decision. in recent yearsThe Board has refused to set… [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 8:36 am
Last month, the military commission for the matter of United States v. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 6:44 am
” and explained that the only opportunity for the prosecution to question Jenna would come on cross-examination.Following Jenna’s cross-examination, Flanagan wrote to Juror-12 that her “mind [was] blown that the daughter [was not] a suspect. [read post]
22 Oct 2019, 11:06 am
It is time for the United States to stop debating whether to address it, and start talking about how to address it. [read post]
22 Oct 2019, 9:00 am
Some states have an exception, whereby they allow healthcare clinicians from different professions to be housed together as shareholders within the same professional corporation. [read post]
22 Oct 2019, 7:38 am
Facts: This case (Burroughs Diesel, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 11:00 am
Only five attorneys crossed the two-minute threshold during the term. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 3:59 am
On Friday afternoon, the justices added four cases to their merits docket, including Seila Law v. [read post]
19 Oct 2019, 11:10 am
The case is State v. [read post]
19 Oct 2019, 5:48 am
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Texas and Garrison & Associates. [read post]
18 Oct 2019, 12:56 pm
Finally, in Lomax v. [read post]
18 Oct 2019, 10:02 am
Supreme Court in Daubert v. [read post]
18 Oct 2019, 8:21 am
Facts: This case (Patenaude v. [read post]
17 Oct 2019, 11:23 am
Henry v Foxco sets out the elements to consider when determining if an employer has just cause to dismiss. [read post]
16 Oct 2019, 12:19 pm
Facts: This case (Parker v. [read post]
15 Oct 2019, 9:01 pm
United States v. [read post]
13 Oct 2019, 2:53 pm
Close but not quiteState v. [read post]
13 Oct 2019, 12:54 pm
º, concluding that the responsibility envisaged is irrespective of fault, but stated that responsibility imposed on the controller for acts of the processor is too burdensome and may lead to over deterrence. [read post]
