Search for: "DOE DEFENDANT" Results 3621 - 3640 of 112,789
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jan 2024, 7:00 am by JacksonWhite Law
In addition to these consequences, a defendant will likely also face charges for the predicate offense. [read post]
5 Jan 2024, 7:34 pm by admin
If the state fails to prove the first element, it does not reach the second. [read post]
5 Jan 2024, 4:36 pm by Steven Calabresi
The best case in favor of voting for DeSantis is that he does not carry the baggage that Trump does, but he appeals to MAGA voters who might not go for Nikki Haley. [read post]
5 Jan 2024, 2:52 pm by Amy Howe
A state trial court agreed that Trump engaged in insurrection but concluded that Section 3 does not apply to the president because the presidency is not an “office … under the United States” and the president is not an “officer of the United States. [read post]
5 Jan 2024, 1:48 pm by Eugene Volokh
Because Plaintiff does not allege that his brother's text was seen by anyone other than Plaintiff, or that his comments were heard by anyone else, Plaintiff does not satisfy the publication element. [read post]
5 Jan 2024, 12:50 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
There’s a lot of general confusion about online education, and about the fact that, in order to provide their services, plaintiffs have to associate with public school districts, which are overseen by the Florida DOE, of which defendant is a subagency. [read post]
5 Jan 2024, 12:30 pm by John Ross
His estate sues, and WMATA defends by arguing that when he fell over the ledge he ceased to be a passenger to whom they owed a duty to render aid and became a common paralyzed trespasser. [read post]
5 Jan 2024, 10:31 am by Jordan Gold
It is important to note, however, that the mere existence of a discrete event does not necessarily mean that all time flowing from that event will be deducted from the total delay. [read post]
5 Jan 2024, 10:31 am by Jordan Gold
It is important to note, however, that the mere existence of a discrete event does not necessarily mean that all time flowing from that event will be deducted from the total delay. [read post]
5 Jan 2024, 10:17 am by Richmond Cariaga
Understanding these protections is crucial for employees to defend their interests and seek justice when necessary. [read post]
5 Jan 2024, 9:46 am by Tobin Admin
The statute does not contemplate tolling claims until a plaintiff can demonstrate that she was n [read post]
Defendants tried in federal criminal court get federal judges with lifetime tenure; U.S. service members get nothing even close; change is long overdue. [read post]
5 Jan 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"As to any "state-law claims" raised by Plaintiffs, the Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, declined to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over those claims and dismiss them without prejudice.* Specifically, Plaintiffs argue that the federal district court erred by dismissing their claims against the defendants for violating their Due Process rights by adopting procedures for enforcing the Vaccine Mandate that resulted in the suspension and termination of DOE… [read post]
5 Jan 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"As to any "state-law claims" raised by Plaintiffs, the Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, declined to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over those claims and dismiss them without prejudice.* Specifically, Plaintiffs argue that the federal district court erred by dismissing their claims against the defendants for violating their Due Process rights by adopting procedures for enforcing the Vaccine Mandate that resulted in the suspension and termination of DOE… [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 2:03 pm by lennyesq
Pursuant to the Court’s December 18, 2023, unsealing order, and following conferral with Defendant, Plaintiff files this set of documents ordered unsealed. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 1:08 pm by Dennis Crouch
Winston & Strawn represented another defendant, Silicon Motion, in a related case also filed by UTL. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 12:50 pm by Josh Blackman
The argument begins with the premise that the President takes an oath to "preserve, protect, and defend" the Constitution, found in Article II, and does not take the oath to "support" the Constitution, found in Article VI. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 12:44 pm by John Elwood
The trial court ruled for ASEA, holding that the First Amendment “does not require the State to alter the union dues deduction practices in place prior to” the attorney general opinion. [read post]