Search for: "DOE v. UNITED STATES"
Results 3621 - 3640
of 44,299
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jan 2023, 8:14 am
" The BRA's legal standard at the Initial Appearance was a central reason that the Court in United States v. [read post]
10 Jan 2023, 6:17 am
The United States is one of the 38 OECD members, and the EU also participates in the organization’s work. [read post]
10 Jan 2023, 5:03 am
The remainder involve the federal government, where the court has enforced a clear-statement rule to reflect an interpretive premise that Congress does not often intend to subject the United States to suits for money damages, which supports an expectation that Congress would speak clearly when it intends to do so. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 9:53 am
, Lucas v. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 8:22 am
The rule, as drafted, would prohibit employers throughout the United States from relying on or enforcing covenants to not compete. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 5:31 am
On Dec. 13, 2022, the Israeli Supreme Court published a 51-page judgment in Kohelet Forum v. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 4:54 am
In United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 4:19 am
Breaches of Clause 12 are rare; in most instances in which it is invoked, IPSO determines that the content does not engage it. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 3:35 am
The November argument was in United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 3:00 am
An unsworn report from an expert does not constitute competent evidence to support a motion for summary judgment (see Grasso v Angerami, 79NY2d 813, 814-815 [1991]). [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 7:35 am
This is elaborated a little more in the abstract: Pix credit hereABSTRACT: When the leaders of the United States and of the Peoples Republic of China refer to human rights, they invoke entirely different conceptions. [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
” I have no particular brief for high Federalists from New England, but I do wonder what we might think had Garrison actually been influential and several New England states accepted his view and tried to secede, say, after the Supreme Court’s decision in Prigg v. [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 4:25 am
” She noted that, as in United States v. [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 9:10 am
ShareOhio Adjutant General’s Department v. [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 7:43 am
However, because we are interpreting our state Constitution, we are not bound to the same test that the United States Supreme Court applies to interpret the federal constitution. [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
Many fled across the United States border to Canada. [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 6:03 am
See United States v. [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 6:02 am
Based on this assumption the Court finds that a single family unit is not properly comparable to the unit make up of unrelated disabled residents of a group home. [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 5:53 am
(Never mind that the Insurrection Act does not authorize a president to manufacture an insurrection and then invoke the Act in order to call up private paramilitary organizations operating outside of governmental control.) [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 5:01 am
[C]ourts [interpreting this provision] … apply the balancing test articulated by the United States Supreme Court in Pickering v. [read post]
