Search for: "DOMINIC v. STATE" Results 3621 - 3640 of 4,089
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Aug 2020, 12:30 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
FTDA cases do have slightly lower mean frequency v. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 10:25 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Predictable v. unpredictable. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 9:29 am by ernst
  In contrast, the United States did not even begin scheduled air mail service until 1918. [read post]
21 May 2012, 11:30 pm by Darren O'Donovan
This case would represent a chance for the Irish judiciary to look at again at the Crotty v An Taoiseach, a case recalled with admiration by the barrister Vincent Martin in today’s Irish Times. [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 4:04 pm by David Bernstein
Quoting an article by Felix Frankfurter from 1916, and also citing Ernst Freund, Post states that Progressives had repudiated Lochner v. [read post]
8 Sep 2012, 8:01 am by Mikk Putk
A de-facto or proprietary standard is one where the solution of one (or a few) proprietor(s) become(s) dominant and hence the de-facto standard. [read post]
16 Mar 2013, 12:07 pm by Florian Mueller
I've previously uploaded Google's brief to Docstoc.Antitrust regulators in the United States, Europe and Asia have recently looked at SEP issues in the contexts of merger control (Google-Motorola) and abuse (of a dominant market position). [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 3:21 pm
These Conferences brought together large numbers of Chicano youth from throughout the United States and provided them with opportunities to express their views on self-determination. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 10:18 pm
These Conferences brought together large numbers of Chicano youth from throughout the United States and provided them with opportunities to express their views on self-determination. [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 5:11 am by Daphne Keller
The new tools are used by major players and dominate public discussion, but manual DMCA processing by small rightsholders and OSPs didn't go away. [read post]
7 Mar 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  If this seems too bleak a view of the Court, consider that this is exactly what the Court did in Vega v. [read post]