Search for: "Degree v. United States"
Results 3621 - 3640
of 6,520
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 May 2014, 7:14 pm
The petition of the day is: NSK Corporation v. [read post]
23 May 2014, 11:44 am
United States, 13-127; Brewington v. [read post]
22 May 2014, 7:44 am
For example, the New Deal/Civil Rights legacy may well give new support to religious conservatives, like Michael McConnell, who argue that the pervasive state interventionism of the modern era require a change in the constitutional base-line for assessing religious access to public facilities and subsidies. [read post]
21 May 2014, 6:54 am
United States v. [read post]
20 May 2014, 3:06 pm
Recently, the United States District Court for the District of Montana ordered (pdf) the U.S. [read post]
19 May 2014, 6:41 am
Additional Resources: Bratton v. [read post]
19 May 2014, 5:00 am
The United States District Court held that the ordinance was a fee for the purposes of the TIA. [read post]
15 May 2014, 11:49 pm
The judge in Gardener v. [read post]
14 May 2014, 6:45 am
United States, 505 U.S. 647, 657−58 (1992); Cantu, 253 S.W.3d at 280. [read post]
14 May 2014, 5:02 am
The Court of Appeals begins its opinion by explaining that[t]his appeal arises from a lawsuit filed by [Fasteners for Retail] FFR in an unrelated matter in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. [read post]
13 May 2014, 9:01 pm
The United States Supreme Court already has turned to foreign and international law in its decisions on the death penalty; in the majority opinion in Roper v. [read post]
13 May 2014, 7:55 pm
United States, 265 F.3d 1370, 1380 (Fed. [read post]
13 May 2014, 7:50 pm
And, like the others, she relied to a considerable degree on the reasoning of the Supreme Court last June in United States v. [read post]
[Eugene Volokh] New York’s ‘aggravated harassment’ statute is unconstitutionally overbroad and vague
13 May 2014, 1:08 pm
” Three federal judges have already found this statute unconstitutional (see Vives v the City of New York, 305 F Supp 2d 289, 299 [SD NY 2003, Scheindlin, J.], revd on other grounds 405 F3d 115 [2d Cir 2004] ["where speech is regulated or proscribed based on its content, the scope of the effected speech must be clearly defined"]; see also Vives 405 F3d 115, 123-124 [2d Cir 2004, Cardamone, J., dissenting in part, concurring in part] [Penal Law § 240.30(1)… [read post]
13 May 2014, 5:20 am
The degree of occupancy is the critical factor in determining whether a multifamily dwelling nonconforming use remains in effect. [read post]
12 May 2014, 1:38 pm
The Advocate General stated that ‘an economic operator must be considered a single unit…[and] not be dissected on the basis of its individual activities related to processing of personal data’. [read post]
9 May 2014, 5:11 pm
The dishonor of reading enumerated rights out of the Privileges or Immunities Clause falls to a later case, United States v. [read post]
9 May 2014, 12:37 pm
Town of Greece v. [read post]
8 May 2014, 9:25 am
To date, however, scholars remain deeply divided regarding the nature and scope of the “privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States. [read post]
8 May 2014, 9:00 am
When Ralls filed suit alleging violations of due process and the Administrative Procedure Act, President Obama himself issued a similar order demanding that Ralls divest and stating that he had “credible evidence” that Ralls’ actions might “impair the national security of the United States. [read post]
