Search for: "Does 1 Through 10"
Results 3621 - 3640
of 21,513
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Sep 2012, 2:32 pm
Even worse, that standard itself does not reflect the severity of the smog problem in America. [read post]
2 Apr 2010, 4:55 am
The document does not refer to tax. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 6:04 am
Senator Orrin Hatch (R-Utah), Ranking Member of the Senate Finance Committee, says the premium subsidy provisions of the Patient Protection & Affordable Care act (Affordable Care Act) does not authorize the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) to allow individuals purchasing coverage through a federal health insurance exchange to receive the tax credits and subsidies authorized under new Internal Revenue Code § 36B to offset the cost of being mandated to buy health insurance… [read post]
4 Nov 2016, 7:58 am
Deschamps tried to straighten it out through internal appeals but met no success. [read post]
4 Mar 2016, 5:00 am
Answer #10 You do not need to apply for a new one right away. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 6:00 am
Answer #10 You do not need to apply for a new one right away. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 5:00 am
Therefore, your communication with us through this forum will not be considered as privileged or confidential. [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 6:00 am
Therefore, your communication with us through this forum will not be considered as privileged or confidential. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 11:52 am
Taken together, these rebates reduced the effective royalty burden on Apple to around [REDACTED] per iPhone and iPad through 2016. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 12:19 pm
Here are ten things that lawyers should know about Bitcoin. 1. [read post]
19 Mar 2009, 12:47 pm
I, § 10, cl. 1. [read post]
22 Jul 2009, 1:20 pm
App., 4th Cir., 1/7/09, rehearing denied, 1/28/09). [read post]
10 Aug 2022, 2:43 pm
Strict liability does not require proof of negligence by a defendant. [read post]
16 Oct 2022, 3:29 pm
It does not mean the property is free of contamination. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 10:31 am
To this end, the court considered the following:(1) The nature of the speech The ECtHR found that domestic courts had erred in considering that the nature of the speech at hand would be relevant to the determination of whether Article 10 applies: freedom of expression, in fact, is not limited to certain types of information or ideas or forms of expression: In other words, workplace-related free speech does not only protect comments that demonstrably contribute to… [read post]
29 Sep 2024, 8:34 am
Here are some of the most common questions asked about Listeria on the internet: 1. [read post]
23 Oct 2006, 12:46 pm
"No. 1, it's not going to work," said Col. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 6:29 am
A Trade Marks Act 1994 s.10(2) case [= Art.5(1)(b) of Directive 2008/95: likelihood of confusion on account of similar marks and identical/similar goods], perhaps, or passing off? [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 4:30 am
Id. at *10. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 6:05 am
Figure 1 shows an example of partisan gerrymandering with legislative districts equally controlled by the Purple and Orange parties. [read post]
