Search for: "Does 1-43" Results 3621 - 3640 of 4,490
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Oct 2010, 10:15 am by The Legal Blog
At page 531 of the report, Channell, J said about Mandamus: “It is most useful jurisdiction which enables this Court to set right mistakes”.43. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 10:03 am by The Legal Blog
 The expressions ‘or any time after marriage’ and ‘in connection with the marriage of the said parties’ were introduced by amending Act 63 of 1984 and Act 43 of 1986 with effect from 02.10.1985 and 19.11.1986 respectively. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 11:57 pm by Mike
 As Judge Koh explains, To succeed on its trade dress infringement claim under Section 43 of the Lanham Act, Rodan & Fields must prove: 1) that Clinique’s trade dress creates a likelihood of consumer confusion; and 2) that Rodan & Fields’ trade dress is protectable.Both of these would be stumbling blocks for Rodan & Fields. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 10:29 am
Nevertheless:[88] “Section 60(2) creates a statutory tort, but it does not spring from any previous notional or common law tort. [read post]
16 Oct 2010, 4:42 am by INFORRM
  The public does not have a legitimate interest to know where the plaintiffs are, where they live or how they behave generally in their private lives however well known P2 or for that matter P1 may be. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 12:31 pm by Paul Karlsgodt
  Because CNS does not include all state courts in Colorado, these numbers are not a complete, but given that the majority of the state population is in the counties whose district courts are included in the CNS database, they should give you a rough idea. 2007 32 total filings described as “class actions” 23 federal court 9 state court filings (Denver 7, Douglas 1, Weld 1)   2008 25 total filings 19 federal 6 state (Denver 4, Arapahoe 4,… [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 5:29 am
I'm sure she feels, as we all do, that it is a pleasant surprise and a welcome change to receive anything that does not arrive as an email attachment. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 9:59 am
(See In re Bay-Delta Programmatic Envt'l Impact Report Coordinated Proceedings (2008) 43 Cal.4th 1143, 1169.) [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 10:04 pm
This Briefing Note does not provide a comprehensive or complete statement of the law relating to the issues discussed nor does it constitute legal advice. [read post]
9 Oct 2010, 9:04 pm
This Briefing Note does not provide a comprehensive or complete statement of the law relating to the issues discussed nor does it constitute legal advice. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 8:20 pm
This Briefing Note does not provide a comprehensive or complete statement of the law relating to the issues discussed nor does it constitute legal advice. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 8:05 pm
This Briefing Note does not provide a comprehensive or complete statement of the law relating to the issues discussed nor does it constitute legal advice. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 1:53 pm by Stephen Page
In paragraph 43 of her affidavit filed 15 March 2010 she says as follows: I say that I have endured daily verbal assault from [Mr Palmer]. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 8:15 am by Simon Lester
The court found that "the language in §§ 1673c(b)(2), 1673c(c), and 1677f-1(d) does not clarify Congress's intent on the issue. [read post]