Search for: "Does v. United States of America"
Results 3621 - 3640
of 4,684
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 May 2020, 9:01 pm
“Scarcely any political question arises in the United States,” he wrote in Democracy in America, “that is not resolved, sooner or later, into a judicial question. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 5:00 pm
Putin ("President Vladimir V. [read post]
25 Jul 2021, 4:50 pm
Voice of America had a news. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 3:01 pm
(United States v. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 7:25 am
The case is [2012] NZHC 2076 - The United States of America v Dotcom & Ors. [read post]
15 Oct 2011, 8:40 am
The Court majority in Printz v. [read post]
28 Mar 2010, 12:16 pm
The following Declaration was then adopted: On 23-25 March 2010, more than 50 judges and other experts from Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Canada, France, Egypt, Germany, India, Mexico, New Zealand, Pakistan, Spain, United Kingdom and the United States of America, including experts from the Hague Conference on Private International Law and the International Centre for Missing and Exploited Children, met in Washington, D.C. to discuss cross-border family… [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 6:25 pm
Marine--produced essentially the same lineup as last year's ruling in United States v. [read post]
24 Oct 2008, 4:34 am
The classification system should reflect the nature of the units being classified. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 11:00 am
UNITED STATES v. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 5:02 am
The opinion tells us that "Assuming, without deciding, that the Ketubah is otherwise a valid prenuptial agreement under Connecticut law, does the First Amendment to the United States constitution nonetheless forbid the court to enforce the cited provision? [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 12:44 pm
The trial court ruled for ASEA, holding that the First Amendment “does not require the State to alter the union dues deduction practices in place prior to” the attorney general opinion. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 2:45 am
Amgen Inc., et al., No. 15-1039 (Does the notice requirement of the BPCIA create an effective six-month exclusivity post-FDA approval?) [read post]
18 May 2009, 10:25 am
In United States v. [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 9:55 am
Cockrum v. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 8:06 pm
It’s another for the government that runs a massive special interest state to either decide who gets to speak (e.g., academics, newspaper editors, bloggers, “public interest groups” [update: and other members of the “cognitive elite,” whose average views diverge dramatically from public median]) and who does not (for-profit corporations and unions [update: or just ordinary citizens who band together via a PAC]), or to decide what the content of… [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 8:06 pm
It’s another for the government that runs a massive special interest state to either decide who gets to speak (e.g., academics, newspaper editors, bloggers, “public interest groups” [update: and other members of the “cognitive elite,” whose average views diverge dramatically from public median]) and who does not (for-profit corporations and unions [update: or just ordinary citizens who band together via a PAC]), or to decide what the content of one’s speech will be… [read post]
28 Sep 2022, 6:42 am
On July 27, 2020, she stood with a group calling themselves "America's Frontline Doctors" in front of the United States Supreme Court to publicly advocate the use of hydroxychloroquine ("HCQ") to treat COVID-19. [read post]
7 Mar 2008, 4:56 pm
Here is an abstract of one of his recent articles, Originalism, Abortion and the Constitution of the United States (Balkin, Jack M., "Abortion and Original Meaning". [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 6:30 am
LaCroix does not settle for the easy or the familiar. [read post]
