Search for: "FAIR v. THE STATE"
Results 3621 - 3640
of 30,472
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Mar 2022, 5:28 pm
In Moore v. [read post]
3 Mar 2022, 10:08 am
Judge Steeves noted that the last final offer mode of arbitration has been accepted as “fair” by courts in Canada in McLaren v. [read post]
3 Mar 2022, 8:56 am
[iv] The general idea is that private equity valuations be prudent, reflecting the fair value of underlying holdings. [read post]
3 Mar 2022, 7:05 am
In Parkmerced Invs. v. [read post]
2 Mar 2022, 2:33 pm
The United States, as incarnated in its Chief Executive and as articulated in his State of the Union, suggests this process of aging. [read post]
1 Mar 2022, 9:00 pm
Davis v. [read post]
1 Mar 2022, 11:32 am
” Petitioners also argued that the map violated the equal-population rule of Wesberry v. [read post]
1 Mar 2022, 9:04 am
Pix Credit HEREThe folks over at the Völkerrechtsblog have posted an excellent essay by Andrew Forde (Visiting Fellow at the Irish Centre for Human Rights at the National University of Ireland, Galway). [read post]
28 Feb 2022, 2:39 pm
From U.S. v. [read post]
28 Feb 2022, 9:59 am
Cohen v. [read post]
28 Feb 2022, 1:10 am
Chapter V of the Regulation authorizes public sector bodies and Union institutions, agencies or bodies to request access to data from data holders if they demonstrate an “exceptional need” to use the data requested. [read post]
27 Feb 2022, 4:30 pm
Norway Norway’s industry minister said the government would be unable to stop a transfer of state-owned telecoms operator Telenor’s metadata of 18 million Myanmar customers. [read post]
27 Feb 2022, 11:33 am
(rejecting per se inadmissibility of eyewitness expert witness opinion testimony). [9] State v. [read post]
27 Feb 2022, 7:43 am
Facebook v. [read post]
26 Feb 2022, 5:00 pm
” In addition to all this, state legislatures have consistently enlisted state judiciaries as partners to implement state constitutional limits and ensure fair elections. [read post]
26 Feb 2022, 12:07 pm
Wade v. [read post]
26 Feb 2022, 3:52 am
Selistö v. [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 6:04 am
Those conditions are met, in particular, when the court of the third State with which the dispute is closely connected refuses to exercise jurisdiction or there are abusive procedural requirements, when, due to civil unrest or natural disasters, it is dangerous to go to certain places and the third State’s normal activity is affected, and, lastly, when access to justice is unduly hampered, in particular when legal representation is prohibitively expensive, when the length of… [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 5:28 am
We previously blogged in 2014 about Marsico v. [read post]
23 Feb 2022, 4:48 pm
After nearly 90 minutes of debate in Arizona v. [read post]
