Search for: "Fee v. Fee"
Results 3621 - 3640
of 31,270
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Aug 2024, 1:32 pm
Connell v. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 12:13 pm
Hecht, writing for the majority and upholding the state’s “pole tax” in Combs v. [read post]
2 Feb 2007, 1:20 am
Per Masters v. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 3:53 pm
The $180 fee -- which I'm sure you can't pay anyway -- is the least of your problems.And yeah, yeah, I know. [read post]
19 Jul 2014, 4:30 am
In Ryan v. [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 8:03 am
Supreme Court in an argued case: In Friedrichs v. [read post]
18 Jun 2024, 11:00 pm
” And that the defendant’s refusal to “sequester” that data needlessly forced the plaintiff to expend considerable fees and costs.Since the motion court was empowered to fashion appropriate relief to prevent “the abuse of disclosure devices,” the AD1 thought the request for protective relief together with the accompanying award of legal fees, was appropriate under the circumstances and “unanimously affirmed” the outcome.Look who got… [read post]
17 Apr 2021, 8:57 am
Poulsen v. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 9:25 am
Category: Recent Decisions;Contract Law Opinions Body: AC35979 - Athena Holdings,LLC v. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 6:05 am
The Council’s second proposal on fee-shifting, circulated in early March 2015, [1] is much like their first, circulated in May 2014 in the wake of ATP Tour v. [read post]
6 Mar 2007, 4:55 pm
Which, reading between the lines, seems like what transpired here with respect to the fees-on-fees stuff. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 9:33 am
In Abood v. [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 11:04 am
Involving the largest fee sanction award ever levied against the EEOC – nearly $4.7 million – EEOC v. [read post]
5 Sep 2007, 6:00 am
Clancy v. [read post]
21 Aug 2017, 7:59 am
Parks, LLC v. [read post]
20 May 2013, 9:09 am
HANCOCK v. [read post]
2 Mar 2007, 9:13 am
Pursuant to Cunningham v. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 3:21 am
Woltmann v. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 12:55 pm
Second, in connection with SASCO v. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 9:05 pm
The company charges probationers monthly fees, other fees on pain of arrest, which results in more fees. [read post]