Search for: "Holder v. United States" Results 3621 - 3640 of 4,275
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Dec 2023, 8:13 am by Jennifer González
Items written by BG Lieber on military and constitutional law: Constitutional Uses of the Military Forces of the United States, 1898. [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
In response (and also in the Times), Stephen Vladeck pointed to the Supreme Court’s 1898 ruling in United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 8:03 pm
(IP tango)   Switzerland Further step to Swiss Federal Patent Court (EPLAW)   United Kingdom Reminder: an appeal is not a re-hearing: Nampak Cartons Ltd v Rapid Action Packaging Ltd (PatLit) Stretching copyright with contract: Global Coal Ltd v. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 1:58 am
  Like many of these cases, the Deutsche Alt-A case was originally filed in state court, and removed by defendants to federal court. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 7:25 am by Lyle Denniston
Justice Breyer, seemingly accepting that the case was about release “into the United States,” used that phrase in his opinion and put it in italics, for emphasis. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 9:00 pm
United States Postal Service, 2006 WL 2687019, *2 (D.D.C. 2006), aff'd No. 06-5321, 2007 U.S. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 1:25 pm
– Discussion of IPFrontline.com article ‘Understanding Intellectual Property Value’: (IP finance), How to make sure your IP strategy plan is not doomed to failure: (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) Improve venture capital returns with IP portfolio management: (Ezine @rticles)   Global - Trade Marks / Domain Names / Brands Trade mark strategy – counterintuitive names: (IP Thinktank), ICANN Intellectual Property Constituency paper on sunrise mechanisms for… [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 6:09 am by John Coyle
In 2019, the United States recognized Venezuela’s Interim President Juan Guaidó as the lawful head of state. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 9:01 pm by John Dean
  Norquist states that his pledge is self-enforcing—”candidates and incumbents solemnly bind themselves”—but in a leading case cited in the Standler essay (above), Schaefer v. [read post]