Search for: "Husband (S) v. Wife (S)" Results 3621 - 3640 of 6,209
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Mar 2012, 10:53 am by Mark Ashton
Pudlish,  where the Superior Court held that a worker’s compensation claim settled after separation was not marital because the employer had denied worker’s compensation up until a time after husband and wife had separated. [read post]
2 Aug 2007, 10:05 am
Stewart ("Wife"), appeals the trial court's grant of summary judgment in favor of her former husband, Thomas C. [read post]
20 Jun 2009, 8:53 am
Ct Nassau Co. 2009), the court held that a husbands refusal to have sex with his wife three times within a year was enough to grant the wife divorce on the grounds of constructive abandonment. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 9:17 am by Steven Eversole
It’s been four years since someone reportedly broke into the home where a 66-year-old man and his 58-year-old wife were sleeping and attempted to rob them, exchanging gunfire in the process. [read post]
14 Dec 2007, 12:01 am
The wife's attorney claims that what she and her husband did "was ordinary conduct that lawyers do. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 2:11 am
In Lloyd, a former wife submitted herself and her children to a custody evaluation performed by an expert at the request of her former husband. [read post]
22 Aug 2008, 4:53 pm
DiModica, 468 F.3d 495, 499 (7th Cir. 2006) (concluding that there was no Fourth Amendment violation where consent to search was obtained from a wife after her husband was removed from the home during the course of a valid arrest); United States v. [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 6:57 am by Allred & Allred
Here’s what happened, according to court records: Plaintiffs – husband and wife – were driving over a bridge that had recently undergone repairs. [read post]
4 Oct 2007, 12:58 pm
Which is one way -- though not a very good one -- to avoid a conviction.I previously commented, back in 2005, on the wife's initial appeal of her conviction to the Ninth Circuit. [read post]
26 Aug 2008, 10:36 am
The appellate court did not elaborate on the nature of the husband's proof and said that the statute should be liberally construed.Judge James C. [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 10:39 am by Eric S. Solotoff
”   Because the husband claimed that he could not pay, this provision was granted because the trial judge found that the ex-wife should not have to wait longer than necessary for payments due her if defendant’s ability to pay what he owed is enhanced. [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 10:39 am by Eric S. Solotoff
”   Because the husband claimed that he could not pay, this provision was granted because the trial judge found that the ex-wife should not have to wait longer than necessary for payments due her if defendant’s ability to pay what he owed is enhanced. [read post]