Search for: "IN THE MATTER OF T W" Results 3621 - 3640 of 8,735
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Nov 2010, 6:11 am by Andrew Barovick
 And if it was truly a matter of conscience, how is it that Elvis continues to perform, on a regular basis, without protest, in the lands of Bush and Margaret Thatcher? [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 10:29 am
We can’t expect anyone, let alone the Commissioner of Internal Revenue, to agree completely with everything we say. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 7:44 am by Theodore J. Kobus III
F - Familiarize yourself with the members of your breach response team before the breach occurs G - Government has its hands in everything when it comes to privacy H - HIPAA/HITECH I -  IT is not the only one responsible for breaches-- it is a C-suite issue J - Joint Commission may ask you about your healthcare breach K - Kids' information is sensitive to parents no matter how low level you may think it is L - Legal landscape is constantly changing M - Mitigation of harm (credit… [read post]
2 May 2012, 8:59 pm by Stan
-> Caixin: The Problem with Letting Gov't Set Oil Prices http://t.co/Bb476hn3 Excellent article. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 2:40 am
Ct. 1758, 1768 n.3 (2010), [w]e do not decide whether 'manifest disregard' survives our decision in Hall Street [], as an independent ground for review or as a judicial gloss on the enumerated grounds for vacatur set forth at 9 U.S.C. [read post]
13 Jul 2008, 7:41 am
" But that doesn't render it weightless. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 9:30 am by azatty
Given the subject matter, ironic, don’t you think? [read post]
1 Jan 2012, 6:18 am by David Bernstein
Long-time associations with controversial figures and inflammatory statements from decades ago either matter or they don’t depending on whom it hurts, etc. etc. [read post]
26 Feb 2009, 2:04 am
 In holding for the City and finding that decision to place or not to place a monument is governmental speech, the court cited a long line of cases holding that a government is entitled to say what it wants,  including George  W. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 3:30 am by John Jenkins
Bainbridge doesn’t believe that directors & executive officers would face liability in this situation: [W]hat liability exposure does the board have when it is aware of a problem and decides to do nothing? [read post]
11 May 2011, 3:12 am by John L. Welch
" The mark is not merely descriptive of wines.Since the PTO failed to establish that consumers would view AMERICAN HERITAGE as describing a significant ingredient of wines, "no matter what grapes are contained in applicant's wine the examining attorney cannot prevail on the Section 2(a) alternative ground of refusal.And so the Board reversed both refusals.TTABlog comment: I don't have any quarrels with this one, do you? [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 4:53 am by Sergio Leal
With respect to the Viles matter, the Court concluded that “[w]hile failure to file a proof of loss, if not waived by the insurer, bars a breach of contract claim, it is not controlling as to the question of breach of the duty of good faith and fair dealing. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 2:00 am
  She notes that the IRS ruling that golf carts may qualify if they are street-legal dates to 2000 (put out in the early months, that is, of the George W. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 3:18 pm by Jon Katz
Don’t let evil triumph in this case, find [the defendant] guilty of first degree murder. [read post]
16 Mar 2009, 3:00 am
Bush, the EFCA has become a matter of increased debate. [read post]