Search for: "In re Grant" Results 3621 - 3640 of 33,768
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jun 2010, 6:00 pm by Erin Miller
  As always, it lists the petitions on the Court’s paid docket that Tom has deemed to have a reasonable chance of being granted. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 10:46 am by Fong & Chun
Many of those affected are people who were granted asylum or refugee status. [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 9:38 am by kgates
Defendants argued that the redactions were necessary to protect confidential business information that was not relevant to the underlying dispute and cited In re Takata Airbag Prods. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 9:16 am by All Language Alliance, Inc.
The plaintiff's motion to compel the re-reproduction of previously produced electronic discovery was also granted as the defendant's original production failed to meet the requirements of Fed. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 7:24 am
The composition of the majority (Judges Cole and Martin) granting the stay in Reynolds v. [read post]
24 Nov 2006, 3:55 pm
So, while we’re pleased that film professors, archivists, cellphone recyclers, and security researchers were able to successfully navigate the exemption process, it appears that digital consumers still have no choice but to get Congress to amend the DMCA. [read post]
24 Apr 2007, 4:15 am
I guess it depends on who you’re polling -but there’s no additional color at this time on the Grant Thornton press release web page. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 3:46 am by Stan
But in addition to the underlying dissatisfaction, I’m starting to wonder whether we’re seeing an uptick in mass incidents simply because they seem to be very effective. [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 11:40 pm
Cir. 2005) (affirming dismissal under Rule 12(b)(1) for lack of subject matter jurisdiction), with In re Elevator Antitrust Litigation, 502 F.3d 47, 49-50 (2d Cir. 2007) (affirming dismissal on 12(b)(6) grounds). [read post]
15 Oct 2008, 12:41 am
Cir. 2005) (affirming dismissal under Rule 12(b)(1) for lack of subject matter jurisdiction), with In re Elevator Antitrust Litigation, 502 F.3d 47, 49-50 (2d Cir. 2007) (affirming dismissal on 12(b)(6) grounds). [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 12:03 pm by Andrew Russell
.), denying defendant Superior Essex's motion for a stay pending re-examination of the patents in suit. [read post]
30 Aug 2009, 6:46 am
As the Court itself notes, understanding the economic contribution of women to the household also has immense potential in re-shaping our understanding of division of matrimonial property. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 5:24 pm by Wetenkamp
  And if you’re in the “love him” camp, then you probably find a way to overlook it. [read post]
A district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Prudential on its Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act (ACPA) claims was affirmed, including the district court’s order that the domain name be transferred to Prudential. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 7:26 am
But, signed "consent to search forms" don't mean much when they're obtained after illegal police activity. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 12:05 pm
While the website is primarily geared toward the re-election of Obama, materials from the 2008 election are also being sold. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 12:05 pm
While the website is primarily geared toward the re-election of Obama, materials from the 2008 election are also being sold. [read post]