Search for: "K. B. R."
Results 3621 - 3640
of 5,019
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Mar 2011, 3:01 pm
In respect of this crucial issue the decision under appeal thus suffers from a deficiency under R 111(2), first requirement.[6.3.2] Documents A and B filed in response to the communication which the board had issued in preparation of the OPs and in which it gave also a preliminary view on that issue (A 100 (b)) do not support the respondent’s position […]. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 3:01 pm
In the present case, the patent proprietor and three of the four opponents filed appeals against the decision of the Opposition Division (OD) to maintain the patent in amended form.The decision is somewhat lengthy; if you are happy with a summary, here is a translation of the headnotes provided by the Board:1. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 8:27 am
Das vorliegende Verfahren betraf die Kündigung eines Mietverhältnisses durch die Vermieterin. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 11:11 pm
Die Ehegatten können die Vorschlagsbeteiligung in gewissen Grenzen ehevertraglich ändern (ZGB 216 I). [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 4:12 pm
Die hier erfüllte Übertretung verjährt gemäss Art. 57 Abs. 2 SBG, einer lex specialis gegenüber Art. 11 Abs. 1 VStrR, nach fünf Jahren.5.2 […] Danach würde die Verjährungsfrist für Übertretungen im Sinne des Spielbankengesetzes das Doppelte, also zehn Jahre, betragen (Art. 333 Abs. 6 lit. b StGB), während sie für Vergehen im Sinne des Spielbankengesetzes mangels einer Spezialregelung in diesem Gesetz nach… [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 3:01 pm
It further stated:“Therefore, it is not necessary to examine the ground for opposition pursuant to A 100 (b). [read post]
26 Mar 2011, 2:37 pm
Re Fannie/Freddie, William K. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 1:58 pm
JENNIFER K. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 10:41 am
‘Ceptin’ Coach K, doin’ his thing.) [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 7:00 am
Section 201(b) of the Dodd-Frank Act requires the FDIC (in consultation with the Secretary of the Treasury) to promulgate regulations establishing standards under which the FDIC will identify nonbank companies that are “predominantly engaged in activities that are financial in nature or incidental thereto. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 4:01 pm
It is therefore the applicant who is entitled to file requests in grant proceedings before the EPO (see for example A 93(1)(b) (request for early publication), R 70(1) (request for examination) and R 71(4) (request for amendments)). [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 4:59 am
eDiscovery News Content and Considerations Agent’s Spoliation Results in Serious Sanctions – http://tinyurl.com/4k7ct6u (K&L Gates) Another “Fox Guarding the Hen House” Case Shows the Dangers of Self-Collection - http://tinyurl.com/4kvo7mx (Ralph Losey) Bad Faith or Culpability ‘May Not Mean Evil Intent, May Simply Signify Responsibility and Control – http://tinyurl.com/4as7vsw (K&L Gates) Calendar Snafu Leads to Default Entered Against… [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 7:17 pm
The same are inter alia outlined hereunder: (a) Use of electronic means such as facsimile or e-mail for notice (Article 2); (b) Insertion of separate clause for response to the notice of arbitration (Article 4); (c) Person acting as a representative of one of the parties may, at the request of any of the parties or by the arbitral tribunal suo moto, be asked to provide proof of authority for such representation (Article 5); (d) Incorporation of an express clause regarding the decision by… [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 1:22 pm
B. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 4:01 pm
The EPO sent a notification pursuant to R 69(1) EPC 1973 dated March 16, 2006. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 1:08 pm
Court Rules, Appendix IX-B to R. 5:6A at 2456 (2011) (“Expense reimbursements are not considered income. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 12:00 pm
Butler & Kurt R. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 5:22 am
R. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 4:27 pm
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW.Ahdieh, Robert B., The visible hand: coordination functions of the regulatory state. 95 Minn. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 4:01 pm
T 228/89 [4.2] referring to T 5/81 [3]).[6.4] From these reasons it follows that the Board of Appeal has not decided “infra petita” and that the condition set out in R 104(b) is not met. [read post]
