Search for: "Laws v. Laws" Results 3621 - 3640 of 269,155
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jun 2012, 11:06 am by Stacy
This past week was no exception, with the issuance of Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Aug 2006, 9:57 am
Connecticut has passed "An Act Concerning the Relocation of Parents Having Custody of Minor Children," to be effective October 1, 2006, that significantly changes the law of parental relocation in Connecticut.The Act is a result of the decision of the Connecticut Supreme Court in Ireland v. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 3:01 am by Walter Olson
“The justices tackle partisan gerrymandering again: In Plain English” [Amy Howe, SCOTUSBlog, earlier on Gill v. [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 1:36 pm by NARF
(Tribal Lending; Arbitration; Choice-of-Law Provision) Garfield County, et al. v. [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 2:07 pm by NARF
Excluded and alone: Examining the experiences of Native American women in the law and a path towards equity. [read post]
5 May 2015, 3:47 am by Sean Patrick Donlan
Taking these two positions as starting points, the paper identifies how courts produce spatial justice, drawing on a case study, the decision by the European Court of Human Rights, Rael v Switzerland (2012). [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
”Wonder how that made Aretha feel ….# # #DECISIONNava v Franklin [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 7:43 pm by Marketing
Read the Changing Workplaces Review Summary Report The post Workplace Laws Are Changing! [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 9:27 am by Lawrence Solum
Lawrence Rosenthal  (Chapman University - School of Law) has posted Pragmatism, Originalism, Race, and the Case Against Terry v. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 8:05 am by Madhav Khosla
This essay in comparative law theory reflects upon India’s recent sodomy decision, Naz Foundation v. [read post]
29 Jun 2021, 4:00 am by Deanne Sowter
Cases like Murdoch v Murdoch, [1975] 1 SCR 423, Rathwell v Rathwell, [1978] 2 SCR 436, Pettkus v Becker, [1980] 2 SCR 834, and Sorochan v Sorochan, [1986] 2 SCR 38 worked their way to the Supreme Court of Canada. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 7:00 am by INFORRM
In the case of Traveller Movement v Ofcom ([2015] EWHC 406 (Admin)) one of the nation’s great televisual fascinations became the unlikely subject of an Administrative Court judgment that demonstrates the limits of common law standards of fairness, as well as the lightness of touch applied by the courts when reviewing the decision-making of the media regulator. [read post]