Search for: "Legall v. State"
Results 3621 - 3640
of 88,740
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Dec 2023, 11:37 pm
This is perhaps unsurprising because the authors, Mr Michael Wilderspin is a legal adviser to the European Commission, and Sir Richard Plender was an English Judge in his lifetime. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 9:04 pm
V, § 11 (3). [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 8:09 pm
See e.g., State v. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 4:19 pm
Perhaps more interestingly, and certainly to me at the time, it was when the defendant distributors tried to strike out his libel claim against them on the grounds of abuse of process (Goldsmith v Sperring [1977] EWCA Civ J0223-1) in the appeal presided over by Lord Denning MR that Bridge LJ, with whom Scarman LJ expressly agreed, publicly chastised the Master of the Rolls as follows: “The Legal Liability of the Distributors. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 3:49 pm
Deski: This case concerns several Texas abortion advocacy groups that seek to fund or support abortion for Texans in states where it remains legal…. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 12:20 pm
(SIRC) initiated a major legal action by filing a $1.1 billion lawsuit against former CEO David M. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 10:21 am
The legal concept of the Chevron doctrine, or Chevron deference, dates back to a 1984 Supreme Court decision, Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 9:59 am
The Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 9:45 am
” The complaint in B.L.R. v. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 9:11 am
But the Supreme Court of Georgia has defined the term “claim” as “a demand for money, property, or a legal remedy to which one asserts a right; especially the part of a complaint in a civil action specifying what relief the plaintiff asks for. [read post]
The Office of Legal Counsel Discloses Classified List of Opinions in Important Step for Transparency
21 Dec 2023, 9:02 am
The case that led to the production of these documents, Francis v. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 9:01 am
” In Murthy v. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 9:00 am
The Board considered that to require such knowledge would be contrary to the objective of the legislator to create legal certainty. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 6:55 am
South Carolina State Conference of the NAACP and AR NAACP v. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 6:33 am
The Court of Appeals rejects her claim.The case is Clark v. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 6:00 am
It has now lost its charm as a legal brain teaser. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 6:00 am
The State Law Libraries Outreach Initiative to strengthen the ties between the Law Library of Congress and state law libraries continues. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 5:01 am
From Luo v. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
The term “family” does not have a precise legal definition. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 3:00 am
The EDPS here referred to the judgment in Case C-70/88 Parliament v Commission, which held that the Court must ‘be able to maintain the institutional balance and, consequently, review the observance of the Parliament’s prerogatives when called upon to do so […] by means of a legal remedy’ (para. 23). [read post]
