Search for: "Line v. People" Results 3621 - 3640 of 13,521
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Aug 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
As there is a bright-line rule limiting the arbitrator to contractual disputes, petitioner's Civil Service Law § 61 (2) claim is not one that might have been arbitrated (see Matter of Melber v New York State Educ. [read post]
8 Aug 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
As there is a bright-line rule limiting the arbitrator to contractual disputes, petitioner's Civil Service Law § 61 (2) claim is not one that might have been arbitrated (see Matter of Melber v New York State Educ. [read post]
30 Aug 2018, 8:22 pm by Anthony Gaughan
It was my chance to help out our own people. . . [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 7:41 am by Russell Beck
The following are some of the highlights: California:  Many people thought noncompetes were DOA with the California Supreme Court’s 2008 Edwards v. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 3:15 am by Ben
Azerbaijan’s Copyright Agency has issued a statement saying Armenians have been stealing the Azerbaijani peoples’ musical compositions, folklore samples and other intangible values for years. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 1:37 pm
  Counsel also learns that the experts will also disclose any active threats by the interviewee to kill people, on the ground that if they fail to do so, there's liability under Tarasoff.Counsel doesn't like that, and thinks that everything should be confidential. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 3:52 am
A more usual decision from the 6th is US v. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 5:19 am by Michael O'Hear
  Add to this the overlay of racial bias — the people who decide how much risk is too much normally have a different skin color than the people who are tagged as the sources of the risk — and you seem to have all of the pieces in place for a large escalation in severity. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 4:55 pm by Rory Little
This morning the Court split six to three as to where the line should be. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 6:41 am
Ciolino argues that the Illinois reporter's privilege is inapplicable, or in the alternative, if the privilege does apply, Preib waived it by speaking on a line he knew was monitored and recorded. [read post]