Search for: "MAY v. US " Results 3621 - 3640 of 120,443
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Mar 2017, 11:58 am
This is one of those rare opinions in which the Ninth Circuit may actually understate the defendant's culpability.Judge Bea begins his opinion by saying:"We seldom run into a “frequent flyer” as “frequent” as appellant. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 12:41 pm by The Federalist Society
The Montana Supreme Court ruled that the state of Montana owns and may charge the hydropower projects rent for use of riverbed. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 8:00 am
On March 30, 2012, New Jersey's Appellate Division issued a ruling in the case of New Jersey v Perini Corp. which explains how New Jersey's 10 year statute of repose applies to projects using phased construction. [read post]
The post Cotter v Revenue and Customs Commissioners [2013] UKSC 69 appeared first on UKSCBlog. [read post]
9 Nov 2022, 12:38 pm by Eric Goldman
’ And under the current Terms (to which Yuksel, by continuing to use Twitter’s platform, has agreed to be bound), Twitter ‘may suspend or terminate [his] account or cease providing [him] with all or part of the Services at any time for any or no reason …..'” Cites to King v. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 9:16 pm by Frank Pasquale
And note that one of the key cases defending opportunities to lie--US v. [read post]
27 Aug 2007, 4:25 am
Back in May 2007, the US Supreme Court granted review in John R. [read post]
7 Apr 2016, 10:20 am by Beth Graham
This and other research papers written by Professor Szalai may be downloaded for free from the Social Science Research Network. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 4:59 am by Benjamin Wittes
(3) Is there a reason to believe that the foreign leader may be being duplicitous in dealing with senior US officials or is attempting to hide information relevant to national security concerns from the US? [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 1:00 am by INFORRM
On 13 July, Sir Anthony May, the President of the Queen’s Bench Division, and Mr Justice Blair handed down their judgment in R (Gaunt) v Ofcom. [read post]