Search for: "Marks v. State "
Results 3621 - 3640
of 21,685
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jan 2021, 9:36 am
State v. [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 4:00 am
A mark must allow consumers to identify the commercial origin of goods and services, which consequently enables future buying decisions, following Sykes v OHIM, Case T‑130/01. [read post]
23 Jan 2021, 7:04 am
In AmerisourceBergen Corporation v. [read post]
[Eugene Volokh] Do Critics of Police Have the First Amendment Procedural Protections That Nazis Get?
22 Jan 2021, 8:26 am
(quotation marks omitted). [read post]
21 Jan 2021, 6:30 am
MISO provides power to 15 U.S. states and Manitoba. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 2:40 pm
From today's Wisconsin Court of Appeals decision in State v. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 10:35 am
The Specifics of the Original Case The underlying case, United States Patent and Trademark Office v. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 9:14 am
State-based registrations offer some of the protections of federal registration, and are a useful tool to stake one’s claim in a trademark within the states that the mark is used, and provide notice to competitors of that claim. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 8:48 am
v. [read post]
19 Jan 2021, 1:18 pm
In Garcetti v. [read post]
19 Jan 2021, 12:14 pm
In United States v. [read post]
19 Jan 2021, 10:43 am
In United States v. [read post]
19 Jan 2021, 8:08 am
Both marks were used for apparel and related retail services (North 61 LLC v. [read post]
19 Jan 2021, 5:41 am
[3] Bank of Montreal v Dynex Petroleum Ltd, 2002 SCC 7 [read post]
19 Jan 2021, 5:41 am
[3] Bank of Montreal v Dynex Petroleum Ltd, 2002 SCC 7 [read post]
19 Jan 2021, 4:00 am
On National Sanctity of Human Life Day, we celebrate the wonder of human existence and renew our resolve to build a culture of life where every person of every age is protected, valued, and cherished.This month, we mark nearly 50 years since the United States Supreme Court’s Roe v. [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 10:23 am
As a threshold matter under the Rogers test, a plaintiff cannot state a viable trademark claim in the context of an artistic work (1) unless the defendant’s use of the mark ‘‘has no artistic relevance to the underlying work whatsoever,’’ or (2) ‘‘if it has some artistic relevance, unless the [use of the mark] explicitly misleads as to the source or the content of the work. [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 8:25 am
” Couture v. [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 7:13 am
Inc. v Bedford Clothiers, Inc., 143 AD3d 491, 493 [1st Dept 2016] [internal quotation marks omitted]). [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 9:01 pm
Harris’ tie-breaking vote) could decide this question for itself, and rely on the Nixon v. [read post]
