Search for: "Minor v. State"
Results 3621 - 3640
of 14,829
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Mar 2021, 7:19 am
A.G. v. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 6:21 am
CEE: Child Exploitation EnterpriseIn United States v. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 6:00 am
” As noted in the 2010 case Matos v. [read post]
14 May 2008, 2:12 pm
This could be a wacky case like Adlerstein v. [read post]
22 Dec 2019, 4:12 pm
In Tagiyev and Huseynov v. [read post]
16 Sep 2024, 9:05 pm
Sullivan v. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 6:30 am
John Witte Jr. writes about the 15-2 decision in Lautsi v. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 11:52 am
" Katz v.United States, 389 U. [read post]
29 Jan 2021, 6:32 am
In Spearman v. [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 6:11 am
The Court noted it had addressed a similar issue in Dennis v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 6:00 am
In the oft quoted words of Willes J in East v Holmes ((1858) 1 F&F 347, 349), “If a man wrote that all lawyers were thieves, no particular lawyer could sue him unless there was something to point to the particular individual“ In the leading English case of Knupffer v Express Newspapers ([1944] AC 116) the “Daily Express” published an article referring to “The quislings on whom Hitler flatters himself he can build a pro-German movement within… [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 4:38 am
West Virginia State Bd. of Educ. v. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 9:01 pm
Therefore, under ordinary circumstances, a cert denial would not be news.Nonetheless, the Court’s cert denial in the conversion therapy case, Tingley v. [read post]
29 May 2017, 7:31 am
’ United States v. [read post]
26 May 2017, 1:36 pm
Kutzke v. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 9:22 am
In the case of Williams v The London Borough of Hackney [2018] UKSC 37, the Supreme Court has reviewed the Children Act 1989, s 20 and given guidance in relation to its application. s 20 is an incredibly far-reaching statutory provision and is used in the context of local authorities providing services to unaccompanied minors, disabled children, abandoned children as well as children who are on the edge of care proceedings. [read post]
26 Dec 2012, 8:24 pm
He argues that the trial court violated his state and federal constitutional rights by requiring him and his wife to bear the burden of proof to terminate the guardianship. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 6:25 am
’ (People v. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 7:26 am
A.H. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 11:00 pm
Supreme Court decided to hear Apodaca v. [read post]
